Vivo X200 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
Here you can compare Vivo X200 Ultra and Sharp Aquos R9 Pro. Comparing Vivo X200 Ultra vs Sharp Aquos R9 Pro on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Vivo X200 Ultra stands against Sharp Aquos R9 Pro and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Vivo X200 Ultra is ₹76,990 and for Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is ₹1,03,990. The details of both of these products were last updated on Jun 02, 2026.
| Specification | Vivo X200 Ultra | Sharp Aquos R9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.7 (Wide Angle) 35mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP ƒ/2.3 (Telephoto) 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 50 MP ƒ/2-2.3 (Ultra Wide) 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS | 50.3 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", PDAF, OIS 50.3 MP ƒ/2.6 (Telephoto) 65mm (telephoto), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS, 2.8x optical zoom 50.3 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.5", PDAF |
| CPU | 4.32 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Battery | 6000 mAh, Si/C Li-Ion | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Display | 6.82 inches, 1440 x 3168 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.7 inches, 1440 x 3120 pixels, 240 Hz |
| Price | ₹76,990 | ₹1,03,990 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 89 / 100 Better Specs | 76 / 100 |
| Display Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels Better Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB More Storage |
| CPU Clock Speed | 4.32 GHz Faster Clock Speed | 3 GHz |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm Slimmer | 9.3 mm |
| Battery | 6000 mAh Bigger Battery | 5000 mAh |
| Unique Features | No No Wireless Charging Reverse Charging IR Blaster | 3.5mm Audio Jack Memory Card Support No No No |
General
| Model | V2454A, V2454DA | SH-54E |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | April 21, 2025 | October 29, 2024 |
Design
| Dimensions | 76.8 x 163.1 x 8.7 mm | 78 x 162 x 9.3 mm |
| Weight | 229 g | 229 g |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Red | Black |
Display
| Type | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) | Color OLED Screen (1B Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 1440 x 3168 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.7 inches, 1440 x 3120 pixels, 240 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | ~ 510 PPI | ~ 513 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 90.2% | ~ 87.2% |
| Glass Type | Armor glass | |
| Brightness | 4500 nits (peak) | |
| HDR Support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Adaptive Refresh Rate | Yes, LTPO | |
| Features | Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid | Dolby Vision, HDR |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
Memory
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | |
| Card Slot | Yes |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Vo5G | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | IEEE802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | Yes, v5.4 |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v3.2 | Yes, USB-C |
| USB Features | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes |
Performance
| Camera Score | 167 (DxOMark) |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | Yes |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min |
| IP Rating | IP69 | IP68 |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | Yes |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.7 (Wide Angle) 35mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, gimbal OIS 200 MP ƒ/2.3 (Telephoto) 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 3.4:1 50 MP ƒ/2-2.3 (Ultra Wide) 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS | 50.3 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", PDAF, OIS 50.3 MP ƒ/2.6 (Telephoto) 65mm (telephoto), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS, 2.8x optical zoom 50.3 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.5", PDAF |
| Camera Sensor | LYT818 | |
| OIS | Yes | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | Leica lens, HDR, panorama |
| Video Recording | 8K @ 30 fps UHD, 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD | 1080p |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 50 MP ƒ/2.5 (Wide Angle) 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF Punch Hole, Screen Flash | 50.3 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole, Screen Flash |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD |
Technical
| OS | Android v15 | Android v14 |
| Custom UI | Origin OS 5 | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen3 |
| CPU | 4.32 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2x Prime Core@4.32 GHz & 6x Performance Core@3.53 GHz | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 735 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes |
Multimedia
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | AAC, OGG, FLAC, WAV, APE, MP3, MP2, MP1 | Yes |
| Video | MP4, 3GP, AVI, Video Recording: MP4 | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 6000 mAh, Si/C Li-Ion | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 90W FlashCharge | Yes |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 40W | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | |
| Reverse Wireless Charging | Yes |
Discuss
Related News
vivo X300 Ultra Review: Unapologetically Ambitious and Camera-focusedThere is a question every serious smartphone buyer eventually asks themselves, usually while standing in a store, weighing a phone they already know they’ll probably buy: Is this really the best I can do? For…
Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. vivo X300 Pro: The Android Flagship Battle Gets FierceThe Galaxy S26 Ultra and vivo X300 Pro don’t exactly come from the same world. One is Samsung’s most premium flagship, carrying years of brand recognition and a loyal following. The other is vivo quietly buil…
vivo X300 Ultra vs. Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Battle Of The Top-Tier Android & iOS FlagshipsGone are the days when the ultra-premium smartphone segment in India was a two-horse race. Today, brands are arriving with their best hardware, their most ambitious engineering, and technologies that have eit…
Asus Went All-out For 20 Years of ROG with a Wild Limited-Edition Computex lineupThe ROG Edition 20 lineup features bold new designs, exclusive ROG Black colorways, and a range of premium finishes. Engineered for superior all-in-one (AIO) cooling and optimized airflow, these products cate…
