Unihertz Jelly Star vs Unihertz Jelly Pro
Here you can compare Unihertz Jelly Star and Unihertz Jelly Pro. Comparing Unihertz Jelly Star vs Unihertz Jelly Pro on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Unihertz Jelly Star stands against Unihertz Jelly Pro and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Unihertz Jelly Star is ₹11,500 and for Unihertz Jelly Pro is ₹5,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on Oct 22, 2026.
| Specification | Unihertz Jelly Star | Unihertz Jelly Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 3.03 inches, 480 x 854 pixels, 60 Hz | 2.45 inches, 1280 x 720 pixels |
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| OS | Android v13 | Android v5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Battery | 2000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 950 mAh |
| RAM | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Price | ₹11,500 | ₹5,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 44 / 100 Better Specs | 23 / 100 |
| Display Size | 3.03 in Bigger Display | 2.45 in |
| Display Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels Better Resolution |
| RAM | 8 GB More RAM | 2 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB More Storage | 16 GB |
| CPU Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz Faster Clock Speed | 1.1 GHz |
| CPU Cores | Octa Core More CPU Cores | Quad Core |
| Rear Camera | 48 MP Better Camera Resolution | 8 MP |
| Front Camera | 8 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | 2 MP |
| Weight | 116 g Lighter | 152 g |
| Thickness | 18.7 mm | 8.9 mm Slimmer |
| Battery | 2000 mAh Bigger Battery | 950 mAh |
| Unique Features | Fingerprint Sensor NFC | No No |
General
| Model | Jelly Star | |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM (Hybrid Slot) | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | |
| Device Type | Smartphone |
Design
| Dimensions | 49.6 x 95.1 x 18.7 mm | 140.8 x 70.4 x 8.9 mm |
| Weight | 116 g | 152 g |
| Bezel less | No | |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | |
| Colors | Red & Blue |
Display
| Type | Color LCD Screen (16M Colors) | |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 3.03 inches, 480 x 854 pixels, 60 Hz | 2.45 inches, 1280 x 720 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 1.779:1 | 16:9 |
| PPI | ~ 323 PPI | ~ 599 PPI |
| Glass Type | Panda Glass | |
| Notch | No | |
| Foldable Display | No | |
| Dual Display | No |
Memory
| RAM | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | |
| Card Slot | Yes, (Hybrid Slot) | Yes |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | |
| EDGE | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes |
| Wifi Version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac), Dual Band | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.3, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | |
| USB Features | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging, USB Storage |
Extra
| GPS | Glonass, Galileo Beidou, A-GPS | Yes |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Rear | |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity, Barometer, Light, Compass, Gyroscope, Pedometer, Geomagnetic, Fingerprint, Gravity | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Extra Features | Rugged Phone |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 48 MP ƒ/1.75 (Main) | 8 MP |
| Camera Sensor | Samsung S5KGM2 | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | |
| Features | Digital Zoom, Geo-Tagging, Panorama Mode, Touch Focus, Exposure Compensation | |
| Video Recording | 1440p @ 30 fps QHD | No |
| Flash | Yes, Dual LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 8 MP ƒ/2 (Main) Punch Hole | 2 MP |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
Technical
| OS | Android v13 | Android v5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| CPU | 2.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 1.1 GHz, Quad Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2 x Cortex-A76@2.2 GHz & 6 x Cortex-A55@2.0 GHz | |
| GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 | |
| Java | No | Yes, via 3rd party |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
| Music | AAC, AAC+, AME, eAAC+, FLAC, M4A, MIDI, MP3, OGG, WMA, WAV, ALAC, APE | |
| Video | 3GPP, AVI, MP4, MKV, DivX, WMV, FLV, ASF, RM, MOV | |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 2000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 950 mAh |
Discuss
Related News
Vivo X500 Pro Max vs. Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max: Two Different Takes on “Pro Max” Phones, Powered by 2nm ChipsWe’re nearing the end of Techtember, and plenty of new flagships are worth talking about. While Apple released its iPhone 18 Pro lineup early this month, Chinese smartphone makers have responded with their ow…
OPPO F35 Pro Review: A Strong Upgrade Over F33 Pro?The F-series has usually been about design, selfies, battery life, and a polished everyday phone rather than benchmark numbers. The F33 Pro followed that closely, and it also left a few obvious gaps. No ultra…
iPhone 18 Pro Problems Apple and Its Influencers Aren’t Talking AboutApple launched the iPhone 18 Pro earlier this month, and the hype machine kicked in right away. Influencers, actors, and singers flooded Instagram with glossy posts about the new phone. But that’s only half t…
ColorOS 17 Review: A New Benchmark for Design, Smoothness, and AIColorOS 17 just hit open beta in India. The update adds a Living Clock lock screen, a translucent Luminous look, and an AI Agent Mode that sorts photos and files on the device. OPPO says app launch stability …
