Oppo A60 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Here you can compare Oppo A60 4G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G. Comparing Oppo A60 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Oppo A60 4G stands against Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Oppo A60 4G is ₹15,990 and for Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G is ₹15,990. The details of both of these products were last updated on Jul 29, 2026.
| Specification | Oppo A60 4G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.67 inches, 720 x 1604 pixels, 90 Hz | 6.67 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| CPU | 2.4 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.8 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| OS | Android v14 | Android v13 |
| Price | ₹15,990 | ₹15,990 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 52 / 100 | 59 / 100 Better Specs |
| Display Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels Better Resolution |
| RAM | 8 GB More RAM | 6 GB |
| CPU Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz Faster Clock Speed |
| Rear Camera | 50 MP + 2 MP Dual | 108 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP Triple Better Camera Resolution |
| Front Camera | 8 MP | 16 MP Better Front Camera Resolution |
| Unique Features | No No | NFC IR Blaster |
General
| Model | A60 4G | Redmi Note 13 |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM (Hybrid Slot) |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | April 24, 2024 | January 15, 2024 |
| In The Box | Phone x 1, USB cable x 1, Charger x 1, SIM ejector x 1, Quick guide x 1, Safety guide x 1, Protective case x1 |
Design
| Dimensions | 76.02 x 165.7 x 7.86 mm | 75.6 x 162.3 x 8 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 188.5 g |
| Bezel less | No | |
| Colors | Midnight Black, Mint Green, Ice Blue, Ocean Sunset |
Display
| Type | Color IPS Screen (16.7 Million) | Color AMOLED Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes, 240 Hz Touch Sampling Rate | Yes |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 720 x 1604 pixels, 90 Hz | 6.67 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20.15:9 | 20.1:9 |
| PPI | ~ 264 PPI | ~ 395 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 89.9% | ~ 87.5% |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | |
| Features | 1800 nits (peak) | |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
Memory
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Expandable RAM | Upto 6 GB Extra Virtual RAM | |
| Storage | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 1 TB | Yes, (Hybrid Slot), upto 1 TB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Vo5G | No | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), 802.11a/b/g/n, WLAN 2.4G/WLAN 5.1G/WLAN 5.8G | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0 | Yes, v5.1, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | Yes, USB-C v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes |
Extra
| GPS | Yes with A-GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | Yes, Side |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Splash Resistant | Yes | Yes |
| IP Rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | |
| Extra Features | LPDDR4 @2133 MHz |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Macro) | 108 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 8 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 2 MP ƒ/2.4 (Macro) |
| OIS | No | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Night, Video, Photo, Portrait, Pro Mode, Ultra HD, Panorama, Slow Motion, Timelapse, Sticker, and Text Scanner | HDR, Panorama |
| Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 8 MP ƒ/2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole | 16 MP ƒ/2.4 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole, Screen Flash |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
Technical
| OS | Android v14 | Android v13 |
| Custom UI | ColorOS 14.0.1 | MIUI 14 |
| Chipset | qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| CPU | 2.4 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.8 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver | 4x Cortex-A73@2.8 GHz & 4x Cortex-A53@1.9 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes, supports HTML5 |
Multimedia
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | MP3, AMR, FLAC, APE |
| Video | Yes | MP4, M4V, MKV, XVID |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 5000 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 45W SuperVOOC Charging | Yes, 33W Fast Charging |
| StandBy Time | 26 days | |
| Music Playback Time | 8 days |
Discuss
Related News
POCO M8 Power and POCO X8 to Launch as Rebranded Redmi Note 17 and Note 17 Pro in IndiaXiaomi’s dual-branding strategy is getting more confusing by the generation, and the Redmi Note 17 series is the latest example. Both phones that just launched in China this week are set to arrive globally we…
Redmi Note 17 and Note 17 Pro Launched in China: Specs, Price, and India Launch DetailsXiaomi has officially launched the Redmi Note 17 series in China, skipping the Note 16 name entirely and jumping straight from Note 15 to Note 17. The company is positioning this generation around bigger batt…
Redmi Note 17 Series Chipsets Leak Ahead of Launch, China Debut Confirmed for July 14The Redmi Note 17 series is right around the corner, and we now have our first look at the chipsets Xiaomi is preparing for global markets. According to tipster Yogesh Brar, the global lineup will look someth…
Google Pixel 11 Pro Could Ship With Smaller Batteries, Despite A Confirmed Price RevisionWith the Made by Google event now just weeks away, a fresh leak suggests the Pixel 11 series won’t just look familiar. It could also cost noticeably more than its predecessor. While that was something Google …
