Vivo X300 Pro 5G vs Vivo X100 Ultra
Here you can compare Vivo X300 Pro 5G and Vivo X100 Ultra. Comparing Vivo X300 Pro 5G vs Vivo X100 Ultra on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Vivo X300 Pro 5G stands against Vivo X100 Ultra and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Vivo X300 Pro 5G is ₹1,09,999 and for Vivo X100 Ultra is ₹76,990. The details of both of these products were last updated on Jul 20, 2026.
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro 5G | Vivo X100 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 4.21 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Display | 6.78 inches, 1260 x 2800 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.78 inches, 1260 x 2800 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Internal Memory | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| OS | Android v16 | Android v14 |
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.6 (Wide Angle) 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP ƒ/2.7 (Telephoto) Telephoto (OIS) 3.5x Optical Zoom HPB Sensor CIPA 5.5 50 MP ƒ/2 (Ultra Wide) 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 23mm, 1/0.98", 1.6µm, PDAF, Laser AF 200 MP ƒ/2.7 (Telephoto) 85mm, 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom 50 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 14mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Price | ₹1,09,999 | ₹76,990 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 94 / 100 Better Specs | 85 / 100 |
| RAM | 16 GB More RAM | 12 GB |
| Storage | 512 GB More Storage | 256 GB |
| CPU Clock Speed | 4.21 GHz Faster Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Thickness | 8 mm Slimmer | 9.2 mm |
| Battery | 6510 mAh Bigger Battery | 5500 mAh |
General
| Model | V2502A | X100 Ultra |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| SAR | 1.14 W/kg (Head) 0.95 W/kg (Body) | |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| OS Updates | 5 years | |
| Security Updates | 7 years | |
| Release Date | December 02, 2025 | May 13, 2024 |
Design
| Dimensions | 75.5 x 161.2 x 8 mm | 75.6 x 164.1 x 9.2 mm |
| Weight | 226 g | 229 g |
| Colors | Dune Gold, Elite Black | Titanium, White, Grey |
Display
| Type | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1.07 billion) | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 1260 x 2800 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.78 inches, 1260 x 2800 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 452 PPI | ~ 453 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 91.6% | ~ 89.5% |
| Glass Type | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | |
| Brightness | 4500 nits Local Peak Brightness, 1 nit Min Brightness | |
| HDR Support | Yes, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Adaptive Refresh Rate | Yes, LTPO | Yes, LTPO |
| Display Dimming | 2160Hz High-Frequency PWM Dimming across all Brightness Levels + Full DC Dimming | |
| Color Gamut | Color 100% P3, Wide Color Gamut | |
| Features | Ultra HDR image support, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, Triple Eye Protection | HDR10+,3000nits |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Curved Display | No |
Memory
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X | |
| Expandable RAM | Upto 16 GB Extra Virtual RAM | |
| Storage | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4 |
| Card Slot | No |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G Bands | n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n71/n75/n77/n78/n79 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | 2.4GHz,5.0GHz, 6.0GHz | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v3.2 | Yes, USB-C v3.2 |
| USB Features | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging, USB Storage | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes | Yes |
Performance
| AnTuTu Score | 3,164,914 (Total) (v11) 974,534 (CPU) 1,227,988 (GPU) 340,415 (Memory) 621,977 (UX) | |
| AnTuTu Storage Score | 127,733 | |
| Geekbench Score | 8,021 (Multi Core) (v6) 3,085 (Single Core) 24,699 (OpenCL) 25,111 (Vulkan) | |
| 3DMark Score | 7,235 (Wild Life Extreme) | |
| Camera Score | 171 (DxOMark) | |
| Speaker Score | 80 (Very Good) | |
| Battery Test Result | 12.57 hours |
Extra
| GPS | GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC, A-GPS, cellular positioning, Wi-Fi positioning | Yes, with GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min |
| IP Rating | IP68 & IP69 | IP69 |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Extra Features | V3+ Chip, Liquid Cooling Vapor Chamber, AI SuperLink |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.6 (Wide Angle) 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 200 MP ƒ/2.7 (Telephoto) Telephoto (OIS) 3.5x Optical Zoom HPB Sensor CIPA 5.5 50 MP ƒ/2 (Ultra Wide) 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 23mm, 1/0.98", 1.6µm, PDAF, Laser AF 200 MP ƒ/2.7 (Telephoto) 85mm, 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom 50 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 14mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Camera Sensor | 50MP (OIS) Sony LYT-828 Sensor CIPA 5.5 | |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import, Snapshot, Landscape & Night, Portrait, Photo, Video, Portrait Video, Ultra HD Document, Slo-mo, Stage, Time-lapse, Pro, AI Storyboard, Telephoto Bird Shots, ZEISS Mirotar Telephoto Style Bokeh, Telephoto Extender | Zeiss Optics, Zeiss lens Coating, Panorama, HDR |
| Video Recording | 8K @ 30 fps UHD, 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD | 4K @ 30/60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 50 MP ƒ/2 (Wide Angle) 50MP JN1 AF Punch Hole, Screen Flash | 50 MP ƒ/2.5 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole, Screen Flash |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
Technical
| OS | Android v16 | Android v14 |
| Custom UI | OriginOS 6 | Origin OS 4 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen3 |
| CPU | 4.21 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro | 1xPrime Core@ 3.3 GHz & 5xPerformance Cores@3.2 GHz & 2xEfficiency Cores@2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 750 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes |
Multimedia
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | WAV, MP3, MP2, MIDI, Vorbis, APE, FLAC | AAC, OGG, FLAC, WAV, APE, MP3, MP2, MP1 |
| Video | MP4, 3GP, AVI, Video Recording: MP4 | MP4, 3GP, AVI, Video Recording: MP4 |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 6510 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 5500 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 90W Fast Charging | Yes, 80W FlashCharge |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 40W Wireless FlashCharge | Yes, 30W |
Discuss
Related News
Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. vivo X300 Pro: The Android Flagship Battle Gets FierceThe Galaxy S26 Ultra and vivo X300 Pro don’t exactly come from the same world. One is Samsung’s most premium flagship, carrying years of brand recognition and a loyal following. The other is vivo quietly buil…
vivo X300 Ultra vs. Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Battle Of The Top-Tier Android & iOS FlagshipsGone are the days when the ultra-premium smartphone segment in India was a two-horse race. Today, brands are arriving with their best hardware, their most ambitious engineering, and technologies that have eit…
vivo X300 Ultra Review: Unapologetically Ambitious and Camera-focusedThere is a question every serious smartphone buyer eventually asks themselves, usually while standing in a store, weighing a phone they already know they’ll probably buy: Is this really the best I can do? For…
Reserved WhatsApp Usernames Are Going Live For Some UsersWhatsApp opened username reservations in late June, allowing users to claim a unique handle before the feature went live later this year. However, the Indian government responded almost immediately, issuing a…
















