Samsung Omnia LITE B7300 vs Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus S7500
Here you can compare Samsung Omnia LITE B7300 and Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus S7500. Comparing Samsung Omnia LITE B7300 vs Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus S7500 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Samsung Omnia LITE B7300 stands against Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus S7500 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Samsung Omnia LITE B7300 is ₹4,890 and for Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus S7500 is ₹2,599. The details of both of these products were last updated on Jun 08, 2026.
| Specification | Samsung Omnia LITE B7300 | Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus S7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Memory | 250 MB | 3 GB |
| Rear Camera | 3 MP | 5 MP |
| CPU | 800 MHz, Single Core Processor | 1 GHz, Single Core Processor |
| Battery | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1300 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Price | ₹4,890 | ₹2,599 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 14 / 100 | 18 / 100 Better Specs |
| Display Size | 3 in | 3.65 in Bigger Display |
| Display Resolution | 240 x 400 pixels | 320 x 480 pixels Better Resolution |
| RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB More RAM |
| Storage | 250 MB | 3 GB More Storage |
| CPU Clock Speed | 800 MHz | 1 GHz Faster Clock Speed |
| Rear Camera | 3 MP | 5 MP Better Camera Resolution |
| Weight | 103 g Lighter | 115 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 11.2 mm Slimmer |
| Battery | 1500 mAh Bigger Battery | 1300 mAh |
| Unique Features | No | 3.5mm Audio Jack |
General
| Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
| Dual Sim | No | No |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | June, 2009 | January, 2012 |
Design
| Dimensions | 51.8 x 107 x 12.9 mm | 62.5 x 114.5 x 11.2 mm |
| Weight | 103 g | 115 g |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
| Type | Color TFT Screen (65K colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen (16M colors Colors) |
| Touch | Yes, Resistive | Yes |
| Size | 3 inches, 240 x 400 pixels | 3.65 inches, 320 x 480 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 5:3 | 3:2 |
| PPI | ~ 155 PPI | ~ 158 PPI |
Memory
| Phonebook | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Storage | 250 MB | 3 GB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes, upto 32 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes 3.6 Mbps Download | Yes 7.2 Mbps Download |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 | Yes, v3.0 |
| USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB Charging, USB Storage |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | Yes, with A-GPS Support |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | Yes |
| Extra | DLNA | DLNA |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 3 MP | 5 MP |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Smile detection, Geo tagging | Smile detection, Panorama |
| Video Recording | 480p @ 15 fps | 480p @ 30 fps |
| Flash | Yes, LED | |
| Front Camera | No | No |
Technical
| OS | Windows Mobile v6.5 | Android v2.3.6 (Gingerbread) |
| Chipset | S3C6410 | |
| CPU | 800 MHz, Single Core Processor | 1 GHz, Single Core Processor |
| Java | Yes, MIDP v2 | Yes, via 3rd party |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML | Yes, supports HTML/Flash |
Multimedia
| Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Voice Commands, Calendar | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Voice Commands, Calendar, YouTube Player |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA | MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+ |
| Video | MPEG4, H.263, H.264, DivX, XviD, WMV | MPEG4, H.263, H.264 |
| FM Radio | Yes, with FM Recording | Yes |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1300 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| StandBy Time | 27 days | 27 days |
| Talk Time | 9 hours | 11 hours |
Discuss
Related News
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Review: A Safe Update in the Plus LineupSamsung’s Plus model has usually sat in a slightly awkward spot. The Ultra gets most of the attention, the base model gets picked for its size and price, and the Plus ends up in between. This year, it still s…
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Long-Term Review: It Ruined Normal Phones For MeFor a long time, I viewed folding phones as an expensive, fragile gimmick. But after spending several months with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, I have to admit I was wrong, its the first Fold that truly feels …
Samsung Confirms Pixel-Level Privacy Display, Here’s How It Works on Galaxy S26 UltraSamsung has officially announced a new privacy feature for upcoming Galaxy phones, introducing what it calls pixel-level privacy. This confirmation comes directly from Samsung Mobile Press, making it clear th…
iQOO 16 And OnePlus 16 May Launch Earlier This YearThe Chinese smartphone manufacturer iQOO has been one of the most aggressive players in the Indian Android flagship market, especially over the past two years, when it has undercut the price of other flagship…
