Meizu 21 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K80
Here you can compare Meizu 21 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi K80. Comparing Meizu 21 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K80 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Meizu 21 Pro stands against Xiaomi Redmi K80 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Meizu 21 Pro is ₹57,999 and for Xiaomi Redmi K80 is ₹30,990. The details of both of these products were last updated on Sep 02, 2026.
| Specification | Meizu 21 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K80 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.9 (Wide Angle) 10 MP ƒ/2 (Telephoto) 13 MP ƒ/2.4 (Ultra Wide) | 50 MP ƒ/1.6 (Wide Angle) 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP (Ultra Wide) |
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Battery | 5050 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 6550 mAh, Si/C |
| Display | 6.79 inches, 1368 x 3192 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.67 inches, 1440 x 3200 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Price | ₹57,999 | ₹30,990 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 77 / 100 Better Specs | 74 / 100 |
| Display Resolution | 1368 x 3192 pixels | 1440 x 3200 pixels Better Resolution |
| Front Camera | 32 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | 20 MP |
| Battery | 5050 mAh | 6550 mAh Bigger Battery |
| Unique Features | Wireless Charging Reverse Charging | No No |
General
| Model | 21 Pro | K80 |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | Nano+Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | February 29, 2024 | November 27, 2024 |
Design
| Dimensions | 74.4 x 165 x 8 mm | 75 x 160.3 x 8.1 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 206 g |
| Bezel less | No | |
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Green | Black, White, Mint, Blue |
Display
| Type | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) | Color OLED Screen (1B Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes, 480 Hz Touch Sampling Rate |
| Size | 6.79 inches, 1368 x 3192 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.67 inches, 1440 x 3200 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 512 PPI | ~ 526 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 87.4% | ~ 89.3% |
| Glass Type | Meizu Titan Glass 2.0 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| HDR Support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Adaptive Refresh Rate | Yes, LTPO | |
| Features | HDR10+, 600 nits (typ), 1250 nits (HBM) | Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
Memory
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4 | UFS 4 |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G Bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | |
| VoLTE | Yes | Yes |
| Vo5G | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes, USB-C | Yes, USB-C |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes | Yes |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, IRNSS | Yes, with A-GPS. Up to tri-band: GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer | Accelerometer, Proximity, Gyro, Compass, Color Spectrum |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | Yes, 2.5 m upto 30 min |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | Yes |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.9 (Wide Angle) 10 MP ƒ/2 (Telephoto) 13 MP ƒ/2.4 (Ultra Wide) | 50 MP ƒ/1.6 (Wide Angle) 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP (Ultra Wide) |
| Camera Sensor | Sony IMX800 | |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, Panorama |
| Video Recording | 4K, 1080p | 8K @ 24 fps UHD, 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD, 720p @ 1920 fps HD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 32 MP ƒ/2.4 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole | 20 MP (Wide Angle) Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 60 fps FHD |
Technical
| OS | Android v14 | Android v15 |
| Custom UI | Flyme | MIUI 15 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen3 |
| CPU | 3.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1xCortex-X4@3.3 GHz & 5xCortex-A720@3.2 GHz & 2x Cortex-A520@2.3 GHz | 1xCortex-X4@3.3 GHz & 5xCortex-A720@3.2 GHz & 2x Cortex-A520@2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Adreno 750 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes |
Multimedia
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | Yes |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 5050 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 6550 mAh, Si/C |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 80W Fast Charging | Yes, 90W Fast charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 50W | |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, 10W |
Discuss
Related News
POCO M8 Power and POCO X8 to Launch as Rebranded Redmi Note 17 and Note 17 Pro in IndiaXiaomi’s dual-branding strategy is getting more confusing by the generation, and the Redmi Note 17 series is the latest example. Both phones that just launched in China this week are set to arrive globally we…
Redmi Note 17 India Launch Set for August 6; Xiaomi Teases 8,000 mAh BatteryXiaomi has confirmed that the Redmi Note 17 will launch in India on August 6, 2026. A dedicated Amazon microsite is now live, confirming the launch date and revealing the first official look at the smartphone…
Xiaomi 17 vs Motorola Edge 70 Pro+: Do You Really Need to Spend ₹42,000 More for the Same Camera System?The Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ costs ₹47,999. The Xiaomi 17 costs ₹89,999, a full ₹42,000 more. Both phones pack a 50MP periscope zoom lens and 4K video recording, but the Motorola Edge 70 Pro+ adds a fourth 50MP …
Unreleased MediaTek Chip Surfaces in Vivo X500 Pro Max Benchmark ListingMediaTek hasn’t confirmed the Dimensity 9600 Pro even exists. However, a Vivo X500 Pro Max engineering unit running the unreleased chip has already appeared on Geekbench.Also Read: Samsung’s Exynos 2700 Repor…
