Vivo X100 Ultra vs Vivo X200T
Here you can compare Vivo X100 Ultra and Vivo X200T. Comparing Vivo X100 Ultra vs Vivo X200T on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Vivo X100 Ultra stands against Vivo X200T and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Vivo X100 Ultra is ₹76,990 and for Vivo X200T is ₹59,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on Aug 22, 2026.
| Specification | Vivo X100 Ultra | Vivo X200T |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.78 inches, 1260 x 2800 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.67 inches, 1260 x 2800 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Battery | 5500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 6200 mAh, 3rd Gen Silicon Anode Technology |
| CPU | 3.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.63 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 23mm, 1/0.98", 1.6µm, PDAF, Laser AF 200 MP ƒ/2.7 (Telephoto) 85mm, 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom 50 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 14mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP ƒ/1.6 (Wide Angle) 50 MP1 | IMX921 1/1.56″ sensor | f/1.57 aperture | OIS | ZEISS T* coating | vivo Camera-Bionic Spectrum Technology 2.0 50 MP ƒ/2.6 (Telephoto) 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP ƒ/2 (Ultra Wide) 5mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Price | ₹76,990 | ₹59,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 85 / 100 | 88 / 100 Better Specs |
| CPU Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.63 GHz Faster Clock Speed |
| Front Camera | 50 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | 32 MP |
| Weight | 229 g | 203 g Lighter |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm | 7.99 mm Slimmer |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 6200 mAh Bigger Battery |
| Unique Features | No | Reverse Charging |
General
| Model | X100 Ultra | V2561 |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano+Nano SIM | SIM1 + SIM2 / SIM1 + eSIM1 / eSIM1 + eSIM2 |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | May 13, 2024 | January 27, 2026 |
| In The Box | 1 x Handset, 1 x Type C Cable, 1 x USB Power Adapter, 1 x Sim Ejector, 1 x Protective Case, 1 x Protective Film (Applied), 1 x Documentation |
Design
| Dimensions | 75.6 x 164.1 x 9.2 mm | 74.29 x 160.01 x 7.99 mm |
| Weight | 229 g | 203 g |
| Bezel less | Yes | |
| Colors | Titanium, White, Grey | Seaside Lilac, Stellar Black |
Display
| Type | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) | Color AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 1260 x 2800 pixels, 120 Hz | 6.67 inches, 1260 x 2800 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 453 PPI | ~ 460 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 89.5% | ~ 90.4% |
| Brightness | 5000 nits | |
| HDR Support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Adaptive Refresh Rate | Yes, LTPO | |
| Features | HDR10+,3000nits | Ultra HDR image support, Netflix HDR, HDR 10+ |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Curved Display | No |
Memory
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| RAM Type | LPDDR5X Ultra | |
| Expandable RAM | Upto 12 GB Extra Virtual RAM | |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4 | UFS 4.1 |
| Card Slot | No |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G Bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78 |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | Wi-Fi Display; 2 × 2 MIMO; MU-MIMO; Wi-Fi 6; Wi-Fi 7; 2.4G & 5G dual band | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v3.2 | Yes, USB-C v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | Yes | Yes |
Performance
| AnTuTu Score | 3,000,000 (Total) (v10) |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC, AGPS, Cellular network positioning, Wi-Fi positioning |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, Ambient light sensor, Proximity Sensor, E-compass, Fingerprint Sensor, Color Temperature Sensor, Gyroscope, Laser focus sensor, Infrared Blaster, Flicker Sensor |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| AI Features | AI Search, AI Captions, AI Creation, AI SuperLink | |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min |
| IP Rating | IP69 | IP68 & IP69 |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Extra Features | 4.5K Liquid Cooling Vapor Chamber, Virtual graphics card, Bypass Charging for Gaming |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 50 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 23mm, 1/0.98", 1.6µm, PDAF, Laser AF 200 MP ƒ/2.7 (Telephoto) 85mm, 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom 50 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 14mm, 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP ƒ/1.6 (Wide Angle) 50 MP1 | IMX921 1/1.56″ sensor | f/1.57 aperture | OIS | ZEISS T* coating | vivo Camera-Bionic Spectrum Technology 2.0 50 MP ƒ/2.6 (Telephoto) 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP ƒ/2 (Ultra Wide) 5mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Zeiss Optics, Zeiss lens Coating, Panorama, HDR | Portrait, Photo, Video, Portrait Video, Snapshot, Landscape & Night, Pano, Ultra HD Document, Slo-mo, Stage, Time-lapse, Pro, Food, Street Photography |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30/60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 50 MP ƒ/2.5 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole, Screen Flash | 32 MP ƒ/2 (Ultra Wide) 32 MP1 | KD1 1/3.44″ sensor Punch Hole, Screen Flash |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | 4K @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD |
Technical
| OS | Android v14 | Android v16 |
| Custom UI | Origin OS 4 | OriginOS 6 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| CPU | 3.3 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.63 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1xPrime Core@ 3.3 GHz & 5xPerformance Cores@3.2 GHz & 2xEfficiency Cores@2.3 GHz | 1xCortex-X925@3.63 GHz & 3xCortex-X4@3.3 GHz & 4xCortex-A720@2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G925 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes | Yes |
Multimedia
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | AAC, OGG, FLAC, WAV, APE, MP3, MP2, MP1 | WAV, MP3, MP2, MIDI, Vorbis, APE, FLAC |
| Video | MP4, 3GP, AVI, Video Recording: MP4 | MP4, 3GP, AVI, Video Recording: MP4 |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 5500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 6200 mAh, 3rd Gen Silicon Anode Technology |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 80W FlashCharge | Yes, 90W FlashCharge |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 30W | Yes, 40W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | |
| Bypass Charging | Yes |
Discuss
Be the first to leave a comment.
Related News
Moto Edge 70 Max vs. vivo X200T: Which Is The Better ₹60,000 Premium Mid-Range Android Phone?Motorola’s Edge 70 Max arrived on July 15 with one of the most ambitious battery-and-display combinations the company has ever put into an India-focused phone. It also comes with the segment’s first Qi 2.2 wi…
vivo X200T vs. OnePlus 15R: Which Is The Best Android Phone Under Rs. 55,000?Call it the upper mid-range segment or the entry-level flagship segment, there are plenty of smartphone options around Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 55,000. But the more options, the more confusion. However, two phones t…
vivo X200T review: The Best Android Phone Under ₹60,000 Right Now?I’ll be honest, when vivo announced the X200T, my first reaction was a shrug. A ‘T’ variant of a phone that already existed, showing up in the shadow of the brand-new X300? It sounded like a parts-bin phone, …
Nothing Confirms Nothing OS 5.0 Launch Date: Check Full List Of Compatible Devices HereNothing has confirmed that Nothing OS 5.0 will be officially unveiled on August 25, 2026. This marks the company’s first release built on Android 17. The announcement itself was minimal. It was through a soci…
