Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus vs Vivo X300
Here you can compare Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus and Vivo X300. Comparing Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus vs Vivo X300 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus stands against Vivo X300 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus is ₹37,999 and for Vivo X300 is ₹83,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on Jul 02, 2026.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Battery | 4300 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 6040 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Rear Camera | 12 MP ƒ/1.5-1.8 (Wide Angle) 12 MP ƒ/2.1 (Telephoto) 16 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) TOF 3D VGA Camera | 200 MP ƒ/1.7 (Wide Angle) 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP ƒ/2.6 (Telephoto) 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP ƒ/2 (Ultra Wide) 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| CPU | 2.73 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 4.21 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Price | ₹37,999 | ₹83,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 64 / 100 | 86 / 100 Better Specs |
| Display Size | 6.8 in Bigger Display | 6.31 in |
| Display Resolution | 1440 x 3040 pixels Better Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels |
| CPU Clock Speed | 2.73 GHz | 4.21 GHz Faster Clock Speed |
| Rear Camera | 12 MP Quad | 200 MP + 50 MP + 50 MP Triple Better Camera Resolution |
| Front Camera | 10 MP | 50 MP Better Front Camera Resolution |
| Battery | 4300 mAh | 6040 mAh Bigger Battery |
| Unique Features | No FM Radio Memory Card Support No No | 5G No No Reverse Charging IR Blaster |
General
| Country of Origin | India | |
| Model | Galaxy Note 10 Plus | X300 |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM (Hybrid Slot) | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | August 20, 2019 | December 02, 2025 |
Design
| Dimensions | 77.2 x 162.3 x 7.9 mm | 71.9 x 150.6 x 8 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 190 g |
| Bezel less | Yes | |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red, Purple, Pink |
Display
| Type | Color Dynamic AMOLED (16M Colors) | Color AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 1440 x 3040 pixels | 6.31 inches, 1216 x 2640 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 19:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 498 PPI | ~ 484 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 91% | ~ 86.7% |
| HDR Support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Features | HDR10+, Always-on display, Curved Display | 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+ |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Curved Display | Yes |
Memory
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Expandable RAM | Upto 12 GB Extra Virtual RAM | |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3 | UFS 4 |
| Card Slot | Yes, (Hybrid Slot), upto 1 TB | No |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0 | Yes, v5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v3.1 | Yes, USB-C v3.2 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
| IR Blaster | No | Yes |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | Yes, with GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC, A-GPS, Cellular Positioning, Wi-Fi Positioning |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, In Display | Yes, In Display |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer, SpO2 | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min, IP68 | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min |
| IP Rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Dust Resistant | Yes | Yes |
| Extra Features | Embedded S Pen |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 12 MP ƒ/1.5-1.8 (Wide Angle) 12 MP ƒ/2.1 (Telephoto) 16 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) TOF 3D VGA Camera | 200 MP ƒ/1.7 (Wide Angle) 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP ƒ/2.6 (Telephoto) 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP ƒ/2 (Ultra Wide) 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| OIS | Yes | |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | Auto-HDR, Panorama | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T lens Coating, Panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Video Recording | 2160p @ 60 fps UHD, 1080p @ 240 fps FHD, 720p @ 960 fps HD | 4K, 1080p |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 10 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) Autofocus | 50 MP ƒ/2 (Wide Angle) Punch Hole, Screen Flash |
| Front Video Recording | 1440p @ 30 fps QHD | 4K, 1080p |
Technical
| OS | Android v9.0 (Pie) | Android v16 |
| Custom UI | OriginOS 6 | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Exynos 9825 | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 |
| CPU | 2.73 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 4.21 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 | |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Arm G1-Ultra |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes |
Multimedia
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | WAV, MP3, MP2, MIDI, Vorbis, APE, FLAC |
| Video | Yes | MP4, 3GP, AVI, Video Recording: MP4 |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 4300 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 6040 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 45W Fast Charging | Yes, 90W |
| Wireless Charging | Yes | Yes, 40W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes |
Discuss
Related News
Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. vivo X300 Pro: The Android Flagship Battle Gets FierceThe Galaxy S26 Ultra and vivo X300 Pro don’t exactly come from the same world. One is Samsung’s most premium flagship, carrying years of brand recognition and a loyal following. The other is vivo quietly buil…
vivo X300 Ultra Review: Unapologetically Ambitious and Camera-focusedThere is a question every serious smartphone buyer eventually asks themselves, usually while standing in a store, weighing a phone they already know they’ll probably buy: Is this really the best I can do? For…
vivo X300 FE vs iPhone 17 & Samsung S26: The Compact Flagship Battle Set to Get a New LeaderFor years, the smartphone industry implied that choosing a compact phone meant settling for less. Smaller body? Smaller battery. Manageable weight? Downgraded chip. Fits in your pocket? Compromised camera. Th…
The 11 Best 1.5 Ton ACs in India (2026): Compared and RankedIf you want the best 1.5-ton AC in India for 2026, you’re in the right place. Just six months ago, you had to choose between efficiency and features if your budget was under ₹50,000. A high ISEER meant fewer …
