Tecno Camon I vs Samsung Corby TXT B3210
Here you can compare Tecno Camon I and Samsung Corby TXT B3210. Comparing Tecno Camon I vs Samsung Corby TXT B3210 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Tecno Camon I stands against Samsung Corby TXT B3210 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Tecno Camon I is ₹6,990 and for Samsung Corby TXT B3210 is ₹4,090. The details of both of these products were last updated on May 05, 2024.
Specification | Tecno Camon I | Samsung Corby TXT B3210 |
---|---|---|
Internal Memory | 32 GB | 40 MB |
Display | 5.65 inches, 720 x 1440 pixels | 2.2 inches, 220 x 176 pixels |
RAM | 3 GB | |
CPU | 1.3 GHz, Quad Core Processor | |
OS | Android v7.0 (Nougat) | |
Price | ₹6,990 | ₹4,090 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 54 / 100 Better Specs | 15 / 100 |
Sim Count | Dual Sim More Sim Slots | Single Sim |
Display Size | 5.65 in Bigger Display | 2.2 in |
Display Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels Better Resolution | 220 x 176 pixels |
RAM | 3 GB More RAM | |
Storage | 32 GB More Storage | 40 MB |
CPU Clock Speed | 1.3 GHz Faster Clock Speed | |
CPU Cores | Quad Core More CPU Cores | |
Rear Camera | 13 MP Better Camera Resolution | 2 MP |
Front Camera | 13 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | |
Weight | 94 g Lighter | |
Thickness | 7.75 mm Slimmer | 12.9 mm |
Battery | 3050 mAh Bigger Battery | 800 mAh |
Unique Features | Fingerprint Sensor 4G | No No |
General
Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
Dual Sim | Yes | No |
Sim Size | Nano SIM | |
Device Type | Smartphone | |
Release Date | September, 2009 |
Design
Dimensions | 152.19 x 71.09 x 7.75 mm | 59.6 x 112 x 12.9 mm |
Weight | 94 g | |
Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | |
Qwerty | Yes |
Display
Type | Color IPS Screen (16M Colors) | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) |
Touch | Yes | No |
Size | 5.65 inches, 720 x 1440 pixels | 2.2 inches, 220 x 176 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 18:9 | 5:4 |
PPI | ~ 285 PPI | ~ 128 PPI |
Memory
Phonebook | 1000 entries | |
RAM | 3 GB | |
Storage | 32 GB | 40 MB |
Card Slot | Yes, upto 128 GB | Yes, upto 8 GB |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | Yes |
EDGE | Yes | Yes |
3G | Yes | No |
4G | Yes | |
VoLTE | Yes | |
Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 | Yes, v2.1 |
USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
USB Features | USB Tethering |
Extra
GPS | Yes | |
Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | |
Sensors | Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer, Ambient Light Sensor | |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
Rear Camera | 13 MP with autofocus | 2 MP |
Features | Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Face Detection | |
Flash | Yes, Dual LED | |
Front Camera | 13 MP with LED Flash | No |
Technical
OS | Android v7.0 (Nougat) | |
Chipset | MediaTek Helio MT6737 | |
CPU | 1.3 GHz, Quad Core Processor | |
Java | Yes, via 3rd party | Yes, MIDP v2 |
Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Calendar | |
Yes | Yes | |
Music | Yes | MP3, AAC, AAC+, WMA |
Video | Yes | MPEG4, H.263, WMV |
FM Radio | Yes | Yes, with FM Recording |
Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
Size | 3050 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 800 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
StandBy Time | 16 days | |
Talk Time | 450 min |
Discuss
Related News
In 2020, Oppo withdrew its Find X series from India following the launch of Find X2. The company appears to be reconsidering re-entering India’s ultra-premium camera flagship segment. That could be why the br…
Are we feeling the heat rising? It’s that time of year when we all yearn for a cool oasis in our homes. With so many AC brands, choosing the right one can feel like a task. But worry not—we’re here to help! W…
Realme has introduced its mid-tier performance smartphone, the GT Neo 6 SE, in its home market. Just a few days ago, we shared the exciting news about the Realme GT Neo 6 SE’s Geekbench listing. The benchmark…
Do you have black spots on your laptop screen that are not going away? Don’t worry; you’re not alone. Many laptop users encounter this issue, which can be caused by various factors such as dead pixels, dirt, …