Nokia 2720 Fold vs Samsung C5010 Squash
Here you can compare Nokia 2720 Fold and Samsung C5010 Squash. Comparing Nokia 2720 Fold vs Samsung C5010 Squash on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Nokia 2720 Fold stands against Samsung C5010 Squash and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Nokia 2720 Fold is ₹3,099 and for Samsung C5010 Squash is ₹3,199. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 27, 2024.
| Specification | Nokia 2720 Fold | Samsung C5010 Squash |
|---|---|---|
| OS | ||
| Rear Camera | 1.3 MP | 1.3 MP |
| Battery | 860 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 800 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Display | 1.36 inches, 128 x 160 pixels | 2 inches, 128 x 160 pixels |
| CPU | ||
| Price | ₹3,099 | ₹3,199 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 10 / 100 | 15 / 100 Better Specs |
| Display Size | 1.36 in | 2 in Bigger Display |
| Storage | 9 MB | 42 MB More Storage |
| Weight | 90 g | 81 g Lighter |
| Thickness | 17.89 mm | 12.8 mm Slimmer |
| Battery | 860 mAh Bigger Battery | 800 mAh |
| Unique Features | No | Memory Card Support |
General
| Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
| Dual Sim | No | No |
| Device Type | Feature Phone | |
| Release Date | May, 2009 | May, 2010 |
Design
| Dimensions | 46 x 93 x 17.89 mm | 46 x 115 x 12.8 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 81 g |
| Design Type | Flip (Clamshell) | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
| Type | Color TFT Screen (65K colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen (65K colors Colors) |
| Touch | No | No |
| Size | 1.36 inches, 128 x 160 pixels | 2 inches, 128 x 160 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 5:4 | 5:4 |
| PPI | ~ 151 PPI | ~ 102 PPI |
Memory
| Phonebook | 500 entries | 1000 entries |
| Storage | 9 MB | 42 MB |
| Card Slot | No | Yes, upto 8 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | No | Yes |
| Wifi | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2.0 | Yes, v2.1 |
| USB | No | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB Storage |
Extra
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 1.3 MP | 1.3 MP |
| Video Recording | 352 x 288 px @ 15 fps | 320 x 240 px @ 15 fps |
| Front Camera | No | No |
Technical
| Java | Yes, MIDP v2 | Yes, MIDP v2 |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
| Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Calendar | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Calendar |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, AAC | MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WAV, AMR, MIDI |
| Video | MPEG4, H.263, 3GPP | MP4, H.264, H.263 |
| FM Radio | Yes, with FM Recording | Yes, with FM Recording |
Battery
| Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 860 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 800 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| StandBy Time | 18 days | 22 days |
| Talk Time | 5 hours | 6 hours |
Discuss
Related News
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 Patent Shows Slimmer Profile & Wider DisplaySamsung’s recent patent filings have sparked discussion about significant design enhancements that might take the foldable phone experience to new heights. Let’s look into the complexities of these prospectiv…
Samsung trademarks “Ironflex” foldable display tech for upcoming Z Flips and Z FoldsSamsung’s fleet of foldable phones has come a long way ever since the original Samsung Galaxy Fold made its debut with a disastrous turn of events. Today, both Galaxy Z Fold5 and Z Flip5 are among the most re…
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 5G to bring first-of-a-kind titanium frameSamsung has come a long way since the original Samsung Galaxy Fold launched. Cut to now, it is primed to launch the Galaxy Z Fold6 alongside the Galaxy Z Flip6. Latest reports barging in suggest Samsung could…
Vivo T3x 5G Vs. Moto G64 5G Vs. Redmi Note 13 5G: Which Smartphone Offers Better Value?The Chinese smartphone brand Vivo recently launched the T3x 5G in India, a mid-range smartphone that competes with the Moto G64 5G and the Redmi Note 13 5G. Given that prospective customers could be confused …
