Here you can compare Nokia 2700 Classic and Nokia Asha 303. Comparing Nokia 2700 Classic vs Nokia Asha 303 on Smartprix, enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Nokia 2700 Classic stands against Nokia Asha 303 and which one should you buy. The current lowest price found for Nokia 2700 Classic is ₹1,099 and for Nokia Asha 303 is ₹5,279. The details of both of these products were last updated on Sep 23, 2020.
|Specification||Nokia 2700 Classic||Nokia Asha 303|
|CPU||-||1 GHz, Single Core Processor|
|Display||2 inches, 240 x 320 pixels||2.6 inches, 240 x 320 pixels|
|Internal Memory||32 MB||170 MB|
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)
Show:All Features Differences
|Overview||Advantages (Factors To Decide Which Device You Should Buy) Remove All Devices|
|Rankings||# 2||# 1|
|Specs Score||15 / 100||25 / 100|
|Features Present In Only One Device|
Around 14% lighter than Nokia Asha 303. Light weight devices are easier to hold without tiring your arms.
Has a Touch Screen
Touch Displays offer a more interactive experience.
More Responsive Touch Screen
Nokia Asha 303 has a capacitive touch screen which is more responsive than a resistive (not so sensitive) touchscreen.
Around 30% bigger screen than Nokia 2700 Classic. Reading, browsing internet and watching movies is more pleasing experience on a bigger screen.
Nokia Asha 303 is 3G Enabled. 3G Enabled Handsets give you more download speed and a faster internet experience.
Nokia Asha 303 is Wifi Enabled. You can connect to wifi hotspots in your area to experience a superior internet experience.
Has a Qwerty Keypad
Qwerty keypad allows you to type faster.
Better Camera Resolution
Around 60% more mega pixels (MP) than Nokia 2700 Classic. More resolution generally means better picture quality, though it's not always necessary.
More Storage Capacity
Around 431% more inbuilt memory than Nokia 2700 Classic. More memory allows you to store more songs, videos, photos and install more applications.
Around 27% more Battery Capacity than Nokia 2700 Classic. With more battery size, device's battery can generally last more time, though it depends on various other factors too.
Longer Battery Standby Time
Around 140 longer Battery Standby Time than Nokia 2700 Classic. With longer standby time, device's battery can last more days without charging in idle condition.
Longer Battery Talk Time
Around 27 longer Battery Talk Time than Nokia 2700 Classic. With longer battery talk time, you can talk on your device continously without charging.
|Sim Type||Single Sim, GSM||Single Sim, GSM|
|Device Type||Feature Phone|
|Release Date||January, 2009||October, 2011|
|Dimensions||109.2 x 46 x 14 mm||116.5 x 55.7 x 13.9 mm|
|Weight||85 g||99 g|
|Design Type||Classic (Candybar)||Classic (Candybar)|
|Type||Color TFT screen (256K colors)||Color LCD screen (65K colors)|
|Size||2 inches, 240 x 320 pixels||2.6 inches, 240 x 320 pixels|
|PPI||~200 PPI||~154 PPI|
|Storage||32 MB||170 MB|
|Card Slot||Yes, upto 2 GB||Yes, upto 32 GB|
|3G||No||Yes 10.2 Mbps Download 2 Mbps Upload|
|Wifi||No||Yes, with wifi-hotspot|
|Bluetooth||Yes, v2.0||Yes, v2.1|
|USB||Yes, microUSB v2.0||Yes, microUSB v2.0|
|USB Features||USB on-the-go|
|3.5mm Headphone Jack||Yes||Yes|
|Rear Camera||2 MP||3.2 MP|
|Video Recording||220 x 176 px @ 15fps||480p @ 15fps|
|CPU||1 GHz, Single Core Processor|
|Java||Yes, MIDP v2.1||Yes, MIDP v2.1|
|Browser||Yes, supports HTML/Flash||Yes, supports HTML/Flash|
|Supports||MMS, Voice Recording, Voice Commands, Calendar||MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Calendar|
|Music||MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA, WAV, AMR||MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA, WAV, MP4, AMR, MIDI|
|Video||MPEG4, H.263, 3GPP||MPEG4, H.263, H.264, WMV|
|Type||Removable Battery||Removable Battery|
|Size||1020 mAh, Li-ion Battery||1300 mAh, Li-ion Battery|
|StandBy Time||12 days||1 month, 35 days on 3G|
|Talk Time||385 min||490 min, 430 min on 3G|
|Music Playback Time||12 hours||47 hours|
|Differences||Add Another Product||Add Another Product|