Swipe Slate Plus (16GB) vs Acer Iconia Tab A200

Here you can compare Swipe Slate Plus (16GB) and Acer Iconia Tab A200. Comparing Swipe Slate Plus (16GB) vs Acer Iconia Tab A200 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Swipe Slate Plus (16GB) stands against Acer Iconia Tab A200 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Swipe Slate Plus (16GB) is ₹7,999 and for Acer Iconia Tab A200 is ₹15,303. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 27, 2024.

SpecificationSwipe Slate Plus (16GB)Acer Iconia Tab A200
Internal Memory16 GB16 GB
Rear Camera5 MP2 MP
RAM1 GB
Battery5000 mAh, Li-ion Battery3260 mAh, Li-Po Battery
CPU1.2 GHz, Quad Core Processor1 GHz, Dual Core Processor
Price₹7,999₹15,303
Read More
Add Product
Add Product
vs
Add Product
Add Product
  • Like
  • Comment
  • Share

Overview

Specs Score50 / 100
Better Specs
42 / 100
Sim CountDual Sim
More Sim Slots
RAM1 GB
More RAM
CPU Clock Speed1.2 GHz
Faster Clock Speed
1 GHz
CPU CoresQuad Core
More CPU Cores
Dual Core
Rear Camera5 MP
Better Camera Resolution
2 MP
Front Camera2 MP
Better Front Camera Resolution
Weight700 g
Lighter
Thickness12.4 mm
Slimmer
Battery5000 mAh
Bigger Battery
3260 mAh

General

Sim TypeDual Sim, GSM+GSMNo Sim Supported
Dual SimYesNo
Device TypeSmartphoneSmartphone
Release DateJanuary, 2017January, 2012
Voice CallNo

Design

Dimensions175 x 260 x 12.4 mm
Weight700 g

Display

TypeColor IPS ScreenColor (16M colors Colors)
TouchYesYes
Size10.1 inches, 800 x 1280 pixels10.1 inches, 800 x 1280 pixels
Aspect Ratio16:1016:10
PPI~ 149 PPI~ 149 PPI

Memory

RAM1 GB
Storage16 GB16 GB
Card SlotYes, upto 32 GBYes, upto 32 GB

Connectivity

GPRSYesNo
EDGEYesNo
3GYesNo
WifiYes, with wifi-hotspotYes
BluetoothYes, v4.0Yes, v2.1
USBYes, microUSB v2.0Yes, microUSB v2.0
USB FeaturesUSB on-the-go

Extra

GPSYes, with A-GPS SupportYes
Fingerprint SensorNo
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer, Gyroscope
3.5mm Headphone JackYesYes

Camera

Rear Camera5 MP2 MP
FlashYes
Front Camera2 MPNo

Technical

OSAndroid v5.1 (Lollipop)Android v3.2 (Honeycomb)
CPU1.2 GHz, Quad Core Processor1 GHz, Dual Core Processor
GPUULP GeForce
JavaYes, via 3rd partyYes, via 3rd party
BrowserYes, supports HTML/Flash

Multimedia

SupportsYouTube Player
MusicMP3, WAV, WMA, eAAC+
VideoXviD, MP4, H.264, H.263
FM RadioNoNo
Document ReaderYes

Battery

TypeNon-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
Size5000 mAh, Li-ion Battery3260 mAh, Li-Po Battery
StandBy Time10 days
Talk Time8 hours

Discuss

Be the first to leave a comment.

Related News

ImageRealme C65 5G Review: Entry-Level All-rounder with Six-Hitting Power

Realme is back. Yes, I know we have been saying these words too frequently in 2024, but then this is because they hold true. Realme has been on a roll this year. We are just four months into the year and we a…

ImageSamsung Z Fold 6 And Flip 6 Color Options And Storage Variants Tipped By Analyst

The Korean tech giant Samsung is gearing up to launch the next-generation foldables in a couple of months. While we’ve already published 360-degree videos and high-quality renders of the Z Fold 6 and the Z Fl…

ImageQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus With 10-Core Oryon CPU Goes Official, To Power Windows PCs By Mid-2024

On April 24, 2024, Qualcomm announced the launch of the long-awaited Snapdragon X Plus SoC. The chipset promises exceptional performance while maintaining higher efficiency levels. In other words, the X Plus …

ImageVivo T3x 5G Vs. Moto G64 5G Vs. Redmi Note 13 5G: Which Smartphone Offers Better Value?

The Chinese smartphone brand Vivo recently launched the T3x 5G in India, a mid-range smartphone that competes with the Moto G64 5G and the Redmi Note 13 5G. Given that prospective customers could be confused …

Related Tablets