Micromax Q75 vs Samsung Hero 3G E3210
Here you can compare Micromax Q75 and Samsung Hero 3G E3210. Comparing Micromax Q75 vs Samsung Hero 3G E3210 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Micromax Q75 stands against Samsung Hero 3G E3210 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Micromax Q75 is ₹2,890 and for Samsung Hero 3G E3210 is ₹4,015. The details of both of these products were last updated on Oct 06, 2022.
| Specification | Micromax Q75 | Samsung Hero 3G E3210 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | ||
| CPU | ||
| Display | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 2 inches, 128 x 160 pixels |
| Rear Camera | 3.2 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Battery | 1200 mAh | 800 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Price | ₹2,890 | ₹4,015 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 19 / 100 Better Specs | 13 / 100 |
| Display Size | 2.4 in Bigger Display | 2 in |
| Display Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels Better Resolution | 128 x 160 pixels |
| Storage | 87 MB More Storage | 36 MB |
| Rear Camera | 3.2 MP Better Camera Resolution | 0.3 MP |
| Weight | 79 g Lighter | |
| Thickness | 12.2 mm Slimmer | 12.9 mm |
| Battery | 1200 mAh Bigger Battery | 800 mAh |
General
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | No |
| Device Type | Feature Phone | Feature Phone |
| Release Date | February, 2011 |
Design
| Dimensions | 64.5 x 115 x 12.2 mm | 46.4 x 112.8 x 12.9 mm |
| Weight | 79 g | |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | Classic (Candybar) |
| Qwerty | Yes |
Display
| Type | Color TFT Screen (65K colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen (65K colors Colors) |
| Touch | No | No |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 2 inches, 128 x 160 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 5:4 |
| PPI | ~167 PPI | ~102 PPI |
Memory
| Phonebook | 1000 entries | |
| Storage | 87 MB | 36 MB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 8 GB | Yes, upto 8 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | No | No |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2.0 | Yes, v2.1 |
| USB | Yes | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB Storage |
Extra
| GPS | No | No |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 3.2 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Front Camera | No | No |
Technical
| GPU | 0 | |
| Java | Yes | Yes, MIDP v2 |
| Browser | Yes, supports WAP |
Multimedia
| Supports | MMS, Instant Messanging | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Voice Commands, Calendar |
| Yes | ||
| Music | MP3, MIDI, WAV | MP3 |
| Video | AVI, 3GP, MP4 | MP4, H.263 |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes, with FM Recording |
Battery
| Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 1200 mAh | 800 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| StandBy Time | 10 days | 22 days, 13 days on 3G |
| Talk Time | 7 hours | 510 min, 210 min on 3G |
Discuss
Related News
How To Password Protect Photos and Videos on Google Photos?If you are an Android smartphone user, you must be well aware of Google Photos and how you can store and access photos and videos anywhere at any time. Since all the photos and videos are stored on the cloud …
Samsung Galaxy F23 5G Review: Is It A Worthy Buy Under Rs 16000?Samsung Galaxy F23 5G Review Summary Editor’s Rating- 3.75/5 Design Display Battery Camera Performance Pros Decent Camera setup Colorful Display 5G connectivity Fast Charging Clean UI Cons No HDR10 support fo…
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G Review: A perfect upgrade over its predecessor?Samsung Galaxy A53 5G Review Summary Editor’s Ratings: 3.8/5 Design Display Connectivity Performance Battery Camera Pros Good Full HD+ AMOLED display 64MP camera gives good performance UI is good IP67 Rating …
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G Review: A mid-ranger that lasts for daysSamsung Galaxy M33 5G Review Summary Editor’s Rating- 3.6/5 Design Display Battery Camera Performance Pros Strong Battery 5G connectivity Good LCD display Immersive stereo speaker Android 12 Cons Loads of blo…
