Here you can compare Nokia C1-02 and Micromax X365. Comparing Nokia C1-02 vs Micromax X365 on Smartprix, enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Nokia C1-02 stands against Micromax X365 and which one should you buy. The current lowest price found for Nokia C1-02 is ₹950 and for Micromax X365 is ₹3,121. The details of both of these products were last updated on Jan 19, 2021.
| Specification | Nokia C1-02 | Micromax X365 |
|---|---|---|
| OS | - | - |
| Internal Memory | 10 MB | - |
| Battery | 1020 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1300 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Rear Camera | No | 1.3 MP |
| CPU | - | - |
| Price | ₹950 | ₹3,121 |
Features | Nokia C1-02 | Micromax X365 | Vivo Y75 | Poco X2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Show: All Features Differences |  |  | ||
| Overview | Advantages (Factors To Decide Which Device You Should Buy) Remove All Devices | |||
| Rankings | # 2 | # 1 | ||
| Specs Score | 13 / 100 | 17 / 100 | ||
| Features Present In Only One Device (Unique Features) | Light Weight
Around 14% lighter than Micromax X365. Light weight devices are easier to hold without tiring your arms. | Bigger Screen
Around 33% bigger screen than Nokia C1-02. Reading, browsing internet and watching movies is more pleasing experience on a bigger screen. | ||
Longer Battery Standby Time
Around 90 longer Battery Standby Time than Micromax X365. With longer standby time, device's battery can last more days without charging in idle condition. | Better Screen Resolution
Around 275% more pixels than Nokia C1-02. More resolution means sharper and crisper screen. | |||
Longer Battery Talk Time
Around 113 longer Battery Talk Time than Micromax X365. With longer battery talk time, you can talk on your device continously without charging. | Supports 3g
Micromax X365 is 3G Enabled. 3G Enabled Handsets give you more download speed and a faster internet experience. | |||
3.5mm Headphone Jack
Having 3.5mm Jack enables you to connect to large number of other devices (such as speakers) having 3.5mm Port. | Slimmer
Around 9% slimmer than Nokia C1-02. Slimmer devices are easier to carry in pocket and look more fashionable. | |||
Supports Camera
Has a camera for taking photos and recording videos. | ||||
Bigger Battery
Around 27% more Battery Capacity than Nokia C1-02. With more battery size, device's battery can generally last more time, though it depends on various other factors too. | ||||
| General | ||||
| Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | ||
| Dual Sim | No | Yes | ||
| Device Type | Feature Phone | |||
| Release Date | June, 2010 | |||
| Design | ||||
| Dimensions | 108 x 45 x 13.8 mm | 114 x 50 x 12.5 mm | ||
| Weight | 77 g | 90 g | ||
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | |||
| Display | ||||
| Type | Color TFT screen (65K colors) | (65K colors) | ||
| Size | 1.8 inches, 128 x 160 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | ||
| Aspect Ratio | 5:4 | 4:3 | ||
| PPI | ~114 PPI | ~167 PPI | ||
| Memory | ||||
| Phonebook | 1000 entries | |||
| RAM | 16 MB | |||
| Storage | 10 MB | |||
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes | ||
| Connectivity | ||||
| GPRS | Yes | Yes | ||
| EDGE | No | |||
| 3G | No | Yes | ||
| Wifi | No | No | ||
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 | Yes | ||
| USB | Yes, microUSB | |||
| Extra | ||||
| GPS | No | No | ||
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | |||
| Camera | ||||
| Rear Camera | No | 1.3 MP | ||
| Front Camera | No | No | ||
| Technical | ||||
| Java | Yes, MIDP v2.1 | No | ||
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML | Yes, supports WAP | ||
| Multimedia | ||||
| Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging | MMS | ||
| Yes | ||||
| Music | MP3, WAV, WMA, AAC | |||
| FM Radio | Yes, with FM Recording | Yes | ||
| Battery | ||||
| Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery | ||
| Size | 1020 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1300 mAh, Li-ion Battery | ||
| StandBy Time | 21 days | 11 days | ||
| Talk Time | 10 hours | 5 hours | ||
Vivo Y75₹14,999
Poco X2₹14,999
Motorola Moto G 5G₹18,999
