Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5
Here you can compare Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5. Comparing Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Motorola Razr 40 Ultra stands against Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is ₹69,990 and for Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 is ₹62,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on Sep 22, 2026.
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Camera | 12 MP ƒ/1.5 (Wide Angle) 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 108˚, 1/3", 1.12µm, AF | 12 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 24mm, 1/1.76", 1.8µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 123˚, 1.12µm |
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Display | 6.9 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 165 Hz | 6.7 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 120 Hz |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Battery | 3800 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3700 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Price | ₹69,990 | ₹62,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 74 / 100 | 76 / 100 Better Specs |
| Sim Count | Dual Sim More Sim Slots | Single Sim |
| Front Camera | 32 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | 10 MP |
| Unique Features | No | Reverse Charging |
General
| Country of Origin | India | |
| Model | Razr 40 Ultra | Galaxy Z Flip 5 5G |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | No |
| Sim Size | Nano+ E-Sim | Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | June 01, 2023 | July 26, 2023 |
Design
| Dimensions | 74 x 170.8 x 7 mm | 71.9 x 165.1 x 6.9 mm |
| Weight | 184.5 g | 187 g |
| Design Type | Flip (Clamshell) | Flip (Clamshell) |
| Colors | Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta | Mint, Graphite, Cream, Lavender, Gray, Blue, Green, Yellow |
Display
| Type | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) | Color AMOLED Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 165 Hz | 6.7 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | |
| PPI | ~ 413 PPI | ~ 426 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 85.1% | ~ 85.5% |
| Glass Type | Gorilla Glass 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| HDR Support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Adaptive Refresh Rate | Yes, LTPO | |
| Features | 1400 nits peak brightness, HDR10+,123% DCI-P3 | HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Foldable Display | Yes | Yes |
| Dual Display | Yes, OLED , 3.6 inches, 1066 x 1056 pixels, 144Hz Refresh Rate, 4:3 Aspect Ratio, HDR10+ | Yes, Super AMOLED, 3.4 inches, 748 x 720 pixels, 306 PPI |
Memory
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G Bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/ | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Vo5G | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | WiFi-6E | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.3 | Yes, v5.3, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | Yes, USB-C v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
Performance
| Camera Score | 127 (DxOMark) |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | yes with A-GPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeiDou |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | Yes, Side |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min |
| Splash Resistant | Water Repellent Design | |
| IP Rating | IP52 | IPX8 |
| Extra Features | Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos. LPDDR5 RAM | AI Mobile (Galaxy AI), Embedded-SIM |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 12 MP ƒ/1.5 (Wide Angle) 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 108˚, 1/3", 1.12µm, AF | 12 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 24mm, 1/1.76", 1.8µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 123˚, 1.12µm |
| Camera Sensor | Sony IMX563 | |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | panorama, HDR | AR Zone, Bixby Vision, Director's View, Food, Hyperlapse, Night, Panorama, Photo, Portrait, Portrait Video, Pro, Pro Video, Single Take, Slow Motion, Super Slow-Mo, Video |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | K @ 30 fps, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD, 720p @ 960 fps HD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 32 MP ƒ/2.4 (Wide Angle) 0.7µm | 10 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) 26mm, 1.22µm Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | K @ 30 fps |
Technical
| OS | Android v13 | Android v13 |
| Custom UI | OneUi 5.1 | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| CPU | 3.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1x Cortex-X2@3.19 GHz & 3x Cortex-A710@2.75 GHz & 4xCortex-A510@1.8 GHz | 1x Cortex-X3@ 3.36GHz & 4x Cortex-A715@ 2.8GHz & 3x Cortex-A510@2.0 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes |
Multimedia
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | MP3, M4A, 3GA, AAC, OGG, OGA, WAV, AMR, AWB, FLAC, MID, MIDI, XMF, MXMF, IMY, RTTTL, RTX, OTA, APE, DSF, DFF |
| Video | Yes | MP4, M4V, 3GP, 3G2, AVI, FLV, MKV, WEBM |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 3800 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3700 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 30W Rapid Charging | Yes, 25W Fast Charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 5W | Yes, 15W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, 4.5W |
Discuss
2 Comments
Hello , Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Supports 5w Reverse Charging . Why You Have Not Mentioned. And By Looking Towards Other Specs . Clearly Motorola Us The Winner . The Outer Folded Display In Motorola Has Three Punch Holes . Whereas Samsung Has Missed It . So , World Will Try To Say Samsung Is The Clear Winner . But , Wait Let Motorola Come Forward To Lead #HelloMoto
it's not mentioned anywhere on the official website.
Related News
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 Review: Brilliantly Compact, Significant Improvements, Familiar CompromisesThe Galaxy Z Flip lineup has always been Samsung’s answer to a simple question: what if a flagship phone could disappear into your pocket? More than the raw specifications, it’s the actual flip-phone experien…
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: The No-Compromise FoldableThe Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra changes how I think about foldables. Samsung doesn’t dwell on trade-offs for that big 8-inch screen. Instead, it shows what you can actually do with it. The titanium case is just 4.1m…
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 vs Galaxy Z Flip 7: The Price Goes Up By ₹15,000, But Does The Hardware Follow?It’s that time of the year again. Samsung has just announced a new Flip phone, the Flip 8, and it’s currently up for pre-orders. This year, the phone is more expensive than it was last year in India. Samsung …
Amazon Alexa+ India: What It Costs, What It Does, And What Happens After Early AccessAmazon has finally released Alexa+ in India, and it’s not the same version available in the United States. The company has tweaked its most advanced AI assistant in collaboration with labs in Bangalore, Hyder…
I love Motorola