Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5
Here you can compare Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5. Comparing Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Motorola Razr 40 Ultra stands against Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is ₹59,990 and for Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 is ₹79,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on Jun 05, 2026.
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Camera | 12 MP ƒ/1.5 (Wide Angle) 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 108˚, 1/3", 1.12µm, AF | 12 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 24mm, 1/1.76", 1.8µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 123˚, 1.12µm |
| Internal Memory | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Display | 6.9 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 165 Hz | 6.7 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 120 Hz |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Battery | 3800 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3700 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Price | ₹59,990 | ₹79,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 74 / 100 | 76 / 100 Better Specs |
| Sim Count | Dual Sim More Sim Slots | Single Sim |
| Front Camera | 32 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | 10 MP |
| Unique Features | No | Reverse Charging |
General
| Country of Origin | India | |
| Model | Razr 40 Ultra | Galaxy Z Flip 5 5G |
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | No |
| Sim Size | Nano+ E-Sim | Nano SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | June 01, 2023 | July 26, 2023 |
Design
| Dimensions | 74 x 170.8 x 7 mm | 71.9 x 165.1 x 6.9 mm |
| Weight | 184.5 g | 187 g |
| Design Type | Flip (Clamshell) | Flip (Clamshell) |
| Colors | Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta | Mint, Graphite, Cream, Lavender, Gray, Blue, Green, Yellow |
Display
| Type | Color LTPO AMOLED Screen (1B Colors) | Color AMOLED Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 165 Hz | 6.7 inches, 1080 x 2640 pixels, 120 Hz |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | |
| PPI | ~ 413 PPI | ~ 426 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 85.1% | ~ 85.5% |
| Glass Type | Gorilla Glass 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| HDR Support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Adaptive Refresh Rate | Yes, LTPO | |
| Features | 1400 nits peak brightness, HDR10+,123% DCI-P3 | HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Notch | Yes, Punch Hole | Yes, Punch Hole |
| Foldable Display | Yes | Yes |
| Dual Display | Yes, OLED , 3.6 inches, 1066 x 1056 pixels, 144Hz Refresh Rate, 4:3 Aspect Ratio, HDR10+ | Yes, Super AMOLED, 3.4 inches, 748 x 720 pixels, 306 PPI |
Memory
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4 |
| Card Slot | No | No |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| 5G Bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/ | |
| VoLTE | Yes, Dual Stand-By | Yes, Dual Stand-By |
| Vo5G | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Wifi Version | WiFi-6E | |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v5.3 | Yes, v5.3, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes, USB-C v2.0 | Yes, USB-C v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging | USB Tethering, USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
Performance
| Camera Score | 127 (DxOMark) |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | yes with A-GPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeiDou |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | Yes, Side |
| Face Unlock | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) | accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Water Resistance | Yes | Yes, 1.5 m upto 30 min |
| Splash Resistant | Water Repellent Design | |
| IP Rating | IP52 | IPX8 |
| Extra Features | Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos. LPDDR5 RAM | AI Mobile (Galaxy AI), Embedded-SIM |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 12 MP ƒ/1.5 (Wide Angle) 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 108˚, 1/3", 1.12µm, AF | 12 MP ƒ/1.8 (Wide Angle) 24mm, 1/1.76", 1.8µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP ƒ/2.2 (Ultra Wide) 123˚, 1.12µm |
| Camera Sensor | Sony IMX563 | |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
| Auto Focus | Yes | Yes |
| Features | panorama, HDR | AR Zone, Bixby Vision, Director's View, Food, Hyperlapse, Night, Panorama, Photo, Portrait, Portrait Video, Pro, Pro Video, Single Take, Slow Motion, Super Slow-Mo, Video |
| Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | K @ 30 fps, 1080p @ 60 fps FHD, 720p @ 960 fps HD |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 32 MP ƒ/2.4 (Wide Angle) 0.7µm | 10 MP ƒ/2.2 (Wide Angle) 26mm, 1.22µm Punch Hole |
| Front Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD, 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | K @ 30 fps |
Technical
| OS | Android v13 | Android v13 |
| Custom UI | OneUi 5.1 | |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| CPU | 3.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 3.2 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
| Core Details | 1x Cortex-X2@3.19 GHz & 3x Cortex-A710@2.75 GHz & 4xCortex-A510@1.8 GHz | 1x Cortex-X3@ 3.36GHz & 4x Cortex-A715@ 2.8GHz & 3x Cortex-A510@2.0 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes |
Multimedia
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | Yes | MP3, M4A, 3GA, AAC, OGG, OGA, WAV, AMR, AWB, FLAC, MID, MIDI, XMF, MXMF, IMY, RTTTL, RTX, OTA, APE, DSF, DFF |
| Video | Yes | MP4, M4V, 3GP, 3G2, AVI, FLV, MKV, WEBM |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 3800 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3700 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 30W Rapid Charging | Yes, 25W Fast Charging |
| Wireless Charging | Yes, 5W | Yes, 15W |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, 4.5W |
Discuss
2 Comments
Hello , Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Supports 5w Reverse Charging . Why You Have Not Mentioned. And By Looking Towards Other Specs . Clearly Motorola Us The Winner . The Outer Folded Display In Motorola Has Three Punch Holes . Whereas Samsung Has Missed It . So , World Will Try To Say Samsung Is The Clear Winner . But , Wait Let Motorola Come Forward To Lead #HelloMoto
it's not mentioned anywhere on the official website.
Related News
Motorola Razr Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Definitive Premium Book-Style Foldable ComparisonThe foldable market in India is evolving rapidly, and Motorola has now entered the book-style foldable segment with the all-new Motorola Razr Fold. Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold7, the refined evolution of the categ…
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Review: The Smartest Android, But at What Cost?Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra is no longer trying to be the most overpowered piece of physical hardware in your pocket. It wants to be the smartest. For years, the “Ultra” moniker meant you were buying the absol…
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Long-Term Review: It Ruined Normal Phones For MeFor a long time, I viewed folding phones as an expensive, fragile gimmick. But after spending several months with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, I have to admit I was wrong, its the first Fold that truly feels …
The Best Camera and Battery Phones Under Rs 30,000 (And the Ones to Avoid)If you’re shopping for a phone under Rs 30,000 in India in 2026, you’ll notice it’s tougher than ever to get both a great camera and solid battery life in one device. Prices are up because of trade issues, me…
I love Motorola