Samsung Galaxy On Nxt vs HSL Style 1
Here you can compare Samsung Galaxy On Nxt and HSL Style 1. Comparing Samsung Galaxy On Nxt vs HSL Style 1 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Samsung Galaxy On Nxt stands against HSL Style 1 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Samsung Galaxy On Nxt is ₹8,999 and for HSL Style 1 is ₹1,199. The details of both of these products were last updated on May 03, 2024.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy On Nxt | HSL Style 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Memory | 32 GB | 32 MB |
| Battery | 3300 mAh | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Display | 5.5 inches, 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
| CPU | 1.6 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| Rear Camera | 13 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Price | ₹8,999 | ₹1,199 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 57 / 100 Better Specs | 16 / 100 |
| Display Size | 5.5 in Bigger Display | 2.4 in |
| Display Resolution | 1920 x 1080 pixels Better Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels |
| RAM | 3 GB More RAM | |
| Storage | 32 GB More Storage | 32 MB |
| CPU Clock Speed | 1.6 GHz Faster Clock Speed | |
| CPU Cores | Octa Core More CPU Cores | |
| Rear Camera | 13 MP Better Camera Resolution | 0.3 MP |
| Front Camera | 8 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | |
| Weight | 167 g | 75 g Lighter |
| Thickness | 8 mm Slimmer | 11.1 mm |
| Battery | 3300 mAh Bigger Battery | 1500 mAh |
| Unique Features | Fingerprint Sensor 4G No | No No FM Radio |
General
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano SIM | Mini SIM |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Feature Phone |
Design
| Dimensions | 75 x 151.69 x 8 mm | 52.5 x 123 x 11.1 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 75 g |
Display
| Type | Color TFT Screen (16M colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen |
| Touch | Yes | |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 4:3 |
| PPI | ~ 401 PPI | ~ 167 PPI |
Memory
| RAM | 3 GB | |
| Storage | 32 GB | 32 MB |
| Card Slot | Yes | Yes, upto 16 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | No |
| 4G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes | |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v4.1 | Yes |
| USB | Yes | Yes |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go |
Extra
| GPS | Yes | |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 13 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Features | Face detection, Panorama, HDR | |
| Video Recording | 720p @ 30 fps HD | |
| Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
| Front Camera | 8 MP | No |
Technical
| OS | Android v6 (Marshmallow) | |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7870 | |
| CPU | 1.6 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| GPU | ARM Mali T830 MP1 | |
| Java | Yes, via 3rd party | No |
Multimedia
| Music | MP3 | |
| FM Radio | No | Yes, with FM Recording |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 3300 mAh | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| StandBy Time | 18 days | |
| Talk Time | 15 hours |
Discuss
Related News
[Exclusive] Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 First Look in Stunning 360° Video & 5K RendersOver the last few days, we’ve published high-quality renders and 360-degree videos of several purported handsets, including the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Google Pixel Fold 2. We even talked about the Samsung…
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Review: Good Combination of Robust Design & Decent PerformanceSamsung launched the next in its XCover Series in India in February 2024. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 was rolled out with options to choose between two editions- Standard and Enterprise. The phone is specific…
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 5G to bring first-of-a-kind titanium frameSamsung has come a long way since the original Samsung Galaxy Fold launched. Cut to now, it is primed to launch the Galaxy Z Fold6 alongside the Galaxy Z Flip6. Latest reports barging in suggest Samsung could…
Black Spots on your Laptop Screen? Here’s 5 Ways to FixDo you have black spots on your laptop screen that are not going away? Don’t worry; you’re not alone. Many laptop users encounter this issue, which can be caused by various factors such as dead pixels, dirt, …
