Motorola Moto E vs Maxx AX35
Here you can compare Motorola Moto E and Maxx AX35. Comparing Motorola Moto E vs Maxx AX35 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Motorola Moto E stands against Maxx AX35 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Motorola Moto E is ₹3,600 and for Maxx AX35 is ₹2,600. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 26, 2024.
Specification | Motorola Moto E | Maxx AX35 |
---|---|---|
Internal Memory | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display | 4.3 inches, 540 x 960 pixels | 3.5 inches, 320 x 480 pixels |
RAM | 1 GB | 256 MB |
CPU | 1.2 GHz, Dual Core Processor | 1 GHz, Single Core Processor |
Battery | 1980 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1200 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
Price | ₹3,600 | ₹2,600 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 39 / 100 Better Specs | 25 / 100 |
Display Size | 4.3 in Bigger Display | 3.5 in |
Display Resolution | 540 x 960 pixels Better Resolution | 320 x 480 pixels |
RAM | 1 GB More RAM | 256 MB |
Storage | 4 GB More Storage | 512 MB |
CPU Clock Speed | 1.2 GHz Faster Clock Speed | 1 GHz |
CPU Cores | Dual Core More CPU Cores | Single Core |
Rear Camera | 5 MP Better Camera Resolution | 3.2 MP |
Front Camera | 1.3 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | |
Weight | 142 g Lighter | |
Thickness | 12.3 mm Slimmer | |
Battery | 1980 mAh Bigger Battery | 1200 mAh |
Unique Features | FM Radio | No |
General
Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
Release Date | May, 2014 |
Design
Dimensions | 64.8 x 124.8 x 12.3 mm | |
Weight | 142 g | |
Design Type | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
Type | Color (16M colors Colors) | Color LCD Screen |
Touch | Yes | Yes |
Size | 4.3 inches, 540 x 960 pixels | 3.5 inches, 320 x 480 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 3:2 |
PPI | ~ 256 PPI | ~ 165 PPI |
Memory
Phonebook | Unlimited | |
RAM | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Storage | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes, upto 32 GB |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | Yes |
EDGE | Yes | Yes |
3G | Yes 21.1 Mbps Download 5.76 Mbps Upload | No |
Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 | Yes, v2.0 |
USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
Extra
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | Yes, with A-GPS Support |
Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
Rear Camera | 5 MP | 3.2 MP |
Features | Geo tagging, Touch to focus | |
Video Recording | 480p @ 30 fps | |
Flash | Yes, LED | |
Front Camera | No | 1.3 MP |
Technical
OS | Android v4.4 (KitKat) | Android v2.3.6 (Gingerbread) |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 | |
CPU | 1.2 GHz, Dual Core Processor | 1 GHz, Single Core Processor |
GPU | Adreno 302, 400 MHz Single | |
Java | Yes, via 3rd party | Yes |
Browser | Yes, supports HTML | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging, YouTube Player | Instant Messanging, YouTube Player |
Yes, with Push Email | Yes | |
Music | MP3, AAC, WAV | MP3 |
Video | MP4, H.263, H.264 | Yes |
FM Radio | Yes | No |
Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
Size | 1980 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1200 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
Discuss
Related News
The service experience at Google Pixel service centers in India can be mixed, as illustrated by a recent experience shared by a user-facing slow charging issues with his Google Pixel 7 Pro. This article delve…
On April 23, 2024, Redmi launched its latest Android tablet in India – the Redmi Pad SE. The device features an 11-inch screen, runs on a Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset, and draws power from a massive 8,000 mAh …
While it hasn’t been much time since the OnePlus 12 (review) came out, rumors about the OnePlus 13 have started swirling on the internet. The most recent rumor comes from a reliable Chinese tipster, Digital C…
The Taiwan-based chip manufacturing company MediaTek has released a new entry-level smartphone chipset – the Dimensity 6300 SoC. Announced on April 19, 2024, the chipset offers 10 percent faster CPU performan…