Mitashi Play BE102 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 10.5 (WiFi+4G+64GB)
Here you can compare Mitashi Play BE102 and Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 10.5 (WiFi+4G+64…. Comparing Mitashi Play BE102 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 10.5 (WiFi+4G+64… on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Mitashi Play BE102 stands against Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 10.5 (WiFi+4G+64… and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Mitashi Play BE102 is ₹4,900 and for Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 10.5 (WiFi+4G+64… is ₹34,990. The details of both of these products were last updated on Mar 26, 2024.
Specification | Mitashi Play BE102 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 10.5 (WiFi+4G+64… |
---|---|---|
Internal Memory | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Rear Camera | No | 13 MP with autofocus |
Display | 7 inches, 1024 x 600 pixels | 10.5 inches, 1600 x 2560 pixels |
OS | Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean) | Android v8.1 (Oreo) |
RAM | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Price | ₹4,900 | ₹34,990 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 32 / 100 | 83 / 100 Better Specs |
Sim Count | Single Sim More Sim Slots | |
Display Size | 7 in | 10.5 in Bigger Display |
Display Resolution | 1024 x 600 pixels | 1600 x 2560 pixels Better Resolution |
RAM | 512 MB | 4 GB More RAM |
Storage | 4 GB | 64 GB More Storage |
CPU Clock Speed | 1 GHz | 2.35 GHz Faster Clock Speed |
CPU Cores | Single Core | Octa Core More CPU Cores |
Rear Camera | 13 MP Better Camera Resolution | |
Front Camera | 0.3 MP | 8 MP Better Front Camera Resolution |
Weight | 320 g Lighter | 482 g |
Thickness | 10.6 mm | 7.1 mm Slimmer |
Battery | 2800 mAh | 7300 mAh Bigger Battery |
Unique Features | No No | 4G Fast Charging |
General
Sim Type | No Sim Supported | Single Sim, GSM |
Dual Sim | No | No |
Sim Size | Nano SIM | |
Device Type | Smartphone | |
Release Date | October, 2018 | |
Voice Call | Yes |
Design
Dimensions | 120 x 191.2 x 10.6 mm | 164.3 x 249.3 x 7.1 mm |
Weight | 320 g | 482 g |
Display
Type | Color TFT Screen | Color Super AMOLED Screen (16M colors Colors) |
Touch | Yes | Yes |
Size | 7 inches, 1024 x 600 pixels | 10.5 inches, 1600 x 2560 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 16:10 | |
PPI | ~ 170 PPI | ~ 288 PPI |
Memory
RAM | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Storage | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes, upto 512 GB |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | |
EDGE | Yes | |
3G | No | Yes |
4G | Yes | |
VoLTE | Yes | |
Wifi | Yes | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v5.0 | |
USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, Type-C 1.0 reversible connector v3.1 |
USB Features | USB on-the-go, USB Charging |
Extra
GPS | with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | |
Face Unlock | Yes | |
Sensors | Face ID, Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass | |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
Rear Camera | No | 13 MP with autofocus |
Video Recording | 4K @ 30 fps UHD | |
Flash | Yes, LED | |
Front Camera | 0.3 MP | 8 MP |
Technical
OS | Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean) | Android v8.1 (Oreo) |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 | |
CPU | 1 GHz, Single Core Processor | 2.35 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
GPU | Mali-400 MP | Adreno 540 |
Java | Yes, via 3rd party | No |
Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS | |
Yes | ||
Music | MP3, WAV, eAAC+, Flac | |
Video | MP4, H.264 | |
FM Radio | No | No |
Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
Type | Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
Size | 2800 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 7300 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
Fast Charging | Yes |
Discuss
Related News
South Korean tech giant Samsung is reportedly working on two new Galaxy Tab A9 and Galaxy Tab S9 FE Wi-Fi variants and we have been hearing about them for quite a while now. In the ever-evolving landscape of …
Samsung has quietly launched two new tablets in India, the Galaxy Tab A9 and Galaxy Tab A9+. These take after the popular Galaxy Tab A8 lineup and are available on Amazon at the moment. The tablets offer entr…
Although Samsung hasn’t officially announced the Galaxy Tab S9 FE+, Indian e-commerce platform Flipkart has listed the product in the teaser for the upcoming Big Billion Days sale event. From what it looks li…
In recent times, scamsters have found new ways to trick people into sharing their personal information, such as name, email ID, date of birth, or transaction OTPs. A similar case has surfaced on the microblog…