Lenovo Tab M10 HD Tablet (2GB RAM + 16GB) vs iBall iTAB BizniZ Mini Tablet
Here you can compare Lenovo Tab M10 HD Tablet (2GB RAM + 16… and iBall iTAB BizniZ Mini Tablet. Comparing Lenovo Tab M10 HD Tablet (2GB RAM + 16… vs iBall iTAB BizniZ Mini Tablet on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Lenovo Tab M10 HD Tablet (2GB RAM + 16… stands against iBall iTAB BizniZ Mini Tablet and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Lenovo Tab M10 HD Tablet (2GB RAM + 16… is ₹6,695 and for iBall iTAB BizniZ Mini Tablet is ₹5,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 11, 2024.
Specification | Lenovo Tab M10 HD Tablet (2GB RAM + 16… | iBall iTAB BizniZ Mini Tablet |
---|---|---|
OS | Android v9.0 (Pie) | Android v9 (Pie) |
CPU | 1.8 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 1.6 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
RAM | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Battery | 4850 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 4000 mAh |
Rear Camera | 5 MP with autofocus | 8 MP |
Price | ₹6,695 | ₹5,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 59 / 100 | 62 / 100 Better Specs |
Display Size | 10.1 in Bigger Display | 8 in |
Display Resolution | 1280 x 800 pixels | 1200 x 1920 pixels Better Resolution |
Screen To Body Ratio | ~ 73.01% Less Bezels | |
Storage | 16 GB | 32 GB More Storage |
CPU Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz Faster Clock Speed | 1.6 GHz |
Rear Camera | 5 MP | 8 MP Better Camera Resolution |
Front Camera | 2 MP | 5 MP Better Front Camera Resolution |
Weight | 480 g Lighter | |
Thickness | 8.1 mm Slimmer | |
Battery | 4850 mAh Bigger Battery | 4000 mAh |
Unique Features | FM Radio | No |
General
Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
Dual Sim | No | No |
Sim Size | Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
Device Type | Tablet | Tablet |
Voice Call | Yes | Yes |
Design
Dimensions | 168 x 242 x 8.1 mm | |
Weight | 480 g |
Display
Type | Color IPS Screen (16M Colors) | Color IPS Screen |
Touch | Yes | Yes |
Size | 10.1 inches, 1280 x 800 pixels | 8 inches, 1200 x 1920 pixels |
PPI | ~ 224 PPI | |
Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 73.01% |
Memory
RAM | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Storage | 16 GB | 32 GB |
Card Slot | Yes, upto 256 GB | Yes |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | Yes |
EDGE | Yes | Yes |
3G | Yes | Yes |
4G | Yes | Yes |
VoLTE | Yes | |
Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.2 | Yes, v5.0 |
USB | Yes, microUSB | Yes |
USB Features | USB Charging |
Extra
GPS | Yes | with A-GPS |
Fingerprint Sensor | No | |
Sensors | Accelerometer | |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
Rear Camera | 5 MP with autofocus | 8 MP |
Features | Digital Zoom | |
Video Recording | Yes | Yes |
Flash | Yes, LED | |
Front Camera | 2 MP | 5 MP |
Technical
OS | Android v9.0 (Pie) | Android v9 (Pie) |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 | ARM Cortex A55 |
CPU | 1.8 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 1.6 GHz, Octa Core Processor |
Core Details | Octa-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | |
GPU | Adreno 506 | IMG8322 |
Java | No | No |
Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes |
Multimedia
Yes | Yes | |
Music | MP3 | Yes |
Video | MP4, 3GP, AVI | Yes |
FM Radio | Yes | No |
Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
Type | Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
Size | 4850 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 4000 mAh |
Talk Time | 8 hours |
Discuss
Related News
On Tuesday, the Epic Foundation released the first “designed in India” tablet for students. At an affordable price, the tablet offers all the essential features that students need. Further, it also includes t…
At the Consumer Electronics Show 2024, Lenovo announced a new hybrid device that resembles a Windows laptop but doubles as an Android tablet. Essentially, the device consists of two removable parts: one that …
The mobile browsing landscape is the one that changes even if it is still in the process and the majority of users worldwide prefer Google Chrome from Android. The burden of chaos that comes with thousands of…
Introduced in 2019, 5G democratized fast and reliable mobile internet for billions of people across the globe. 5G brought significantly faster speeds than 4G, which was the best wireless communication technol…