Samsung Galaxy Y Duos S6102 vs Spice M-5900
Here you can compare Samsung Galaxy Y Duos S6102 and Spice M-5900. Comparing Samsung Galaxy Y Duos S6102 vs Spice M-5900 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Samsung Galaxy Y Duos S6102 stands against Spice M-5900 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Samsung Galaxy Y Duos S6102 is ₹2,299 and for Spice M-5900 is ₹2,475. The details of both of these products were last updated on Oct 07, 2022.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Y Duos S6102 | Spice M-5900 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | 290 MB | |
| Internal Memory | 160 MB | 200 MB |
| Rear Camera | 3.15 MP | 1.3 MP |
| CPU | 832 MHz, Single Core Processor | |
| Display | 3.14 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 3.5 inches, 320 x 480 pixels |
| Price | ₹2,299 | ₹2,475 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 25 / 100 Better Specs | 18 / 100 |
| Display Size | 3.14 in | 3.5 in Bigger Display |
| Display Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels | 320 x 480 pixels Better Resolution |
| RAM | 290 MB More RAM | |
| Storage | 160 MB | 200 MB More Storage |
| CPU Clock Speed | 832 MHz Faster Clock Speed | |
| CPU Cores | Single Core More CPU Cores | |
| Rear Camera | 3.15 MP Better Camera Resolution | 1.3 MP |
| Weight | 109 g | 70 g Lighter |
| Thickness | 12 mm Slimmer | 13.6 mm |
| Battery | 1300 mAh Bigger Battery | 1000 mAh |
General
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Release Date | December, 2011 |
Design
| Dimensions | 60 x 109.8 x 12 mm | 62 x 114 x 13.6 mm |
| Weight | 109 g | 70 g |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
| Type | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen |
| Touch | Yes, with Multitouch | Yes |
| Size | 3.14 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 3.5 inches, 320 x 480 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| PPI | ~127 PPI | ~165 PPI |
Memory
| RAM | 290 MB | |
| Storage | 160 MB | 200 MB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB, 2 GB included | Yes, upto 8 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | No |
| 3G | Yes 7.2 Mbps Download | No |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v3.0 | Yes |
| USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Extra Features | Mobile Tracker |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 3.15 MP | 1.3 MP |
| Features | Geo tagging | |
| Video Recording | 320 x 240 px @ 24fps | |
| Front Camera | No | No |
Technical
| OS | Android v2.3 (Gingerbread) | |
| CPU | 832 MHz, Single Core Processor | |
| Java | Yes, via 3rd party | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML | Yes, supports WAP |
Multimedia
| Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging, Calendar, YouTube Player | MMS, Instant Messaging |
| Yes, with Push Email | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, WAV, eAAC+ | MP3 |
| Video | MP4, WMV, H.264 | MP4, 3GP |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 1300 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1000 mAh |
| StandBy Time | 15 days | 200 hours |
| Talk Time | 9 hours | 200 min |
Discuss
Related News
Vivo V25 Pro रिव्यु: Nothing Phone (1) से बेहतर परफॉरमेंस ?Vivo V25 Pro रिव्यु का संक्षिप्त विवरण: सम्पादक की रेटिंग: 3.75/5 डिज़ाइन डिस्प्ले परफॉरमेंस बैटरी कैमरा खूबियां बेहतरीन प्राइमरी सेंसर पावरफुल चिपसेट 120Hz AMOLED डिस्प्ले 66W फ़ास्ट चार्जिंग खामियाँ ब्लोटवेयर…
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G Review: A powerful device under 45k?Samsung Galaxy A73 5G review summary: Editor rating: 3.6/5 Design Display Performance Battery Camera Pros Premium design Good display Good performance Great battery life Cons Low light camera performance Old …
[Exclusive] Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 design revealed: dive in for 360 video and 5k rendersA couple of days back we told you about how Samsung is planning to launch the next in their foldable smartphone series featuring Galaxy Z Fold 4 and Galaxy Z Flip 4. Both these phones are expected to arrive s…
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE Review: A near-perfect allrounderSamsung Galaxy S21 FE Review summary: Editor’s rating: 3.85/5 Pros Excellent Display Appealing design Capable cameras Android 12 based software Cons Pricey Comparatively slow charging speeds No charging adapt…
