Motorola Moto E vs Samsung Primo Duos W279
Here you can compare Motorola Moto E and Samsung Primo Duos W279. Comparing Motorola Moto E vs Samsung Primo Duos W279 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Motorola Moto E stands against Samsung Primo Duos W279 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Motorola Moto E is ₹3,600 and for Samsung Primo Duos W279 is ₹6,254. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 19, 2024.
Specification | Motorola Moto E | Samsung Primo Duos W279 |
---|---|---|
Internal Memory | 4 GB | 75 MB |
RAM | 1 GB | |
Battery | 1980 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1200 mAh |
Display | 4.3 inches, 540 x 960 pixels | 2.4 inches, 320 x 240 pixels |
CPU | 1.2 GHz, Dual Core Processor | Single Core Processor |
Price | ₹3,600 | ₹6,254 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 39 / 100 Better Specs | 16 / 100 |
Display Size | 4.3 in Bigger Display | 2.4 in |
Display Resolution | 540 x 960 pixels Better Resolution | 320 x 240 pixels |
RAM | 1 GB More RAM | |
Storage | 4 GB More Storage | 75 MB |
CPU Clock Speed | 1.2 GHz Faster Clock Speed | |
CPU Cores | Dual Core More CPU Cores | Single Core |
Rear Camera | 5 MP Better Camera Resolution | 2 MP |
Weight | 142 g | 103 g Lighter |
Thickness | 12.3 mm Slimmer | 14.07 mm |
Battery | 1980 mAh Bigger Battery | 1200 mAh |
General
Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+CDMA |
Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
Sim Size | Normal SIM | |
Device Type | Smartphone | Feature Phone |
Release Date | May, 2014 |
Design
Dimensions | 64.8 x 124.8 x 12.3 mm | 49.9 x 118.8 x 14.07 mm |
Weight | 142 g | 103 g |
Design Type | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
Type | Color (16M colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) |
Touch | Yes | No |
Size | 4.3 inches, 540 x 960 pixels | 2.4 inches, 320 x 240 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 4:3 |
PPI | ~ 256 PPI | ~ 167 PPI |
Memory
RAM | 1 GB | |
Storage | 4 GB | 75 MB |
Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes, upto 16 GB |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | Yes |
EDGE | Yes | Yes |
3G | Yes 21.1 Mbps Download 5.76 Mbps Upload | No |
4G | No | |
Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 | Yes, v2.1 |
USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, microUSB |
IR Blaster | No |
Extra
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | |
Fingerprint Sensor | No | |
Face Unlock | No | |
Sensors | Accelerometer | |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
Rear Camera | 5 MP | 2 MP |
Features | Geo tagging, Touch to focus | |
Video Recording | 480p @ 30 fps | Yes |
Front Camera | No | No |
Technical
OS | Android v4.4 (KitKat) | |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 | |
CPU | 1.2 GHz, Dual Core Processor | Single Core Processor |
GPU | Adreno 302, 400 MHz Single | |
Java | Yes, via 3rd party | Yes, MIDP v2 |
Browser | Yes, supports HTML | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging, YouTube Player | MMS, Instant Messaging |
Yes, with Push Email | Yes | |
Music | MP3, AAC, WAV | MP3, MIDI, AMR |
Video | MP4, H.263, H.264 | MP4, H.263, H.264 |
FM Radio | Yes | Yes, with FM Recording |
Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
Size | 1980 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1200 mAh |
StandBy Time | 160 hours | |
Talk Time | 390 min |
Discuss
Related News
Last week, we discussed how the Nothing Ear (a) could be one of the best earphones under Rs. 10,000 in India. In our report, we mentioned that the Carl Pei-led company will unveil two earphones on April 18, 2…
While we are still months away from the iPhone 16 launch, rumors about the iPhone 17 have already started surfacing the web. Ross Young, a display expert, shares that the iPhone 17 Plus could have a smaller d…
Remaker AI is a popular generative AI tool that’s primarily known for its face-swapping feature. The tool is completely online and can run on any compatible web browser. Aside from AI face swapping, the tool …
WhatsApp has been compressing photos and videos for years without giving users the choice to opt-out. Fortunately, the app recently rolled out an update that fixed this issue by allowing users to individually…