LG GB220 vs Samsung Hero E3213
Here you can compare LG GB220 and Samsung Hero E3213. Comparing LG GB220 vs Samsung Hero E3213 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how LG GB220 stands against Samsung Hero E3213 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for LG GB220 is ₹2,459 and for Samsung Hero E3213 is ₹2,787. The details of both of these products were last updated on Jan 24, 2023.
| Specification | LG GB220 | Samsung Hero E3213 |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Memory | 6 MB | 36 MB |
| Rear Camera | 1.3 MP | 0.3 MP |
| RAM | ||
| OS | ||
| CPU | ||
| Price | ₹2,459 | ₹2,787 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 11 / 100 | 15 / 100 Better Specs |
| Display Size | 1.04 in | 2 in Bigger Display |
| Display Resolution | 96 x 64 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels Better Resolution |
| Storage | 6 MB | 36 MB More Storage |
| Rear Camera | 1.3 MP Better Camera Resolution | 0.3 MP |
| Weight | 72 g Lighter | 80 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 13.2 mm Slimmer |
| Unique Features | No | 3.5mm Audio Jack |
General
| Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
| Dual Sim | No | No |
| Device Type | Budget Phone | Feature Phone |
| Release Date | February, 2009 | February, 2012 |
Design
| Dimensions | 46 x 105 x 14 mm | 46.4 x 112.8 x 13.2 mm |
| Weight | 72 g | 80 g |
| Design Type | Flip (Clamshell) |
Display
| Type | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen (65K colors Colors) |
| Touch | No | |
| Size | 1.04 inches, 96 x 64 pixels | 2 inches, 128 x 160 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 3:2 | 5:4 |
| PPI | ~111 PPI | ~102 PPI |
Memory
| Phonebook | 1000 entries | |
| Storage | 6 MB | 36 MB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 2 GB | Yes, upto 8 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | No | Yes 3.6 Mbps Download |
| Wifi | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2.0 | Yes, v2.1 |
| USB | Yes v2.0 | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB Charging, USB Storage |
Extra
| GPS | No | No |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | Yes |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 1.3 MP | 0.3 MP |
| Video Recording | 320 x 240 px | |
| Front Camera | No | No |
Technical
| Java | No | Yes |
| Browser | No, supports WAP | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
| Supports | MMS, Voice Recording, Calendar | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Calendar |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, AAC, AAC+ | MP3 |
| Video | Yes | MP4, H.263 |
| FM Radio | Yes, with FM Recording | Yes, with FM Recording |
Battery
| Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 800 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 800 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| StandBy Time | 12 days | 22 days, 13 days on 3G |
| Talk Time | 200 min | 500 min, 200 min on 3G |
Discuss
Related News
Vivo X Fold 2 could specifications tipped online; Check detailsWe got to see Vivo’s first ever foldable smartphone Vivo X Fold this year followed by the launch of the Vivo X Fold+ 5G. However, none of the Vivo foldable made it to the Indian shores which was a disappointm…
Exclusive: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra first look revealed in high resolution; find out what has changedSamsung Galaxy S23 series is a work in progress, and the series has recently appeared on certification websites too. Yesterday we shared the first look of the Samsung Galaxy S23+ and talked about the possible…
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 review: Most voguish phone to get your hands onSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 review summary: Editor’s rating: 3.8/5 Design Display Performance Battery Camera Pros Clamshell design Flex Mode Brilliant camera Cons Weak battery High price Samsung has recently upgr…
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 review: Folding champ gets better with upgradesSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 review summary: Editor’s rating: 4/5 Design Display Performance Battery Camera Pros Foldable design Brilliant display Decent camera Processing capability Cons Charging capacity Afforda…
