Micromax X60 Modu T vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
Here you can compare Micromax X60 Modu T and Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2. Comparing Micromax X60 Modu T vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Micromax X60 Modu T stands against Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Micromax X60 Modu T is ₹3,099 and for Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 is ₹44,990. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 30, 2024.
| Specification | Micromax X60 Modu T | Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | 2.4 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| Battery | 500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 4500 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Internal Memory | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Display | 2.2 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 6.56 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| OS | Android v12 | |
| Price | ₹3,099 | ₹44,990 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 18 / 100 | 79 / 100 Better Specs |
| Sim Count | Single Sim | Dual Sim More Sim Slots |
| Display Size | 2.2 in | 6.56 in Bigger Display |
| Display Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels Better Resolution |
| Screen To Body Ratio | ~ 75.6% Less Bezels | |
| RAM | 4 GB More RAM | |
| Storage | 2 GB | 64 GB More Storage |
| CPU Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz Faster Clock Speed | |
| CPU Cores | Octa Core More CPU Cores | |
| Rear Camera | 5 MP | 25 MP + 8 MP Dual Better Camera Resolution |
| Front Camera | 13 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | |
| Weight | 62 g Lighter | 235 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 10.1 mm Slimmer |
| Battery | 500 mAh | 4500 mAh Bigger Battery |
| Unique Features | No No No No No No No | Fingerprint Sensor 4G 5G Fast Charging 3.5mm Audio Jack Water Resistant NFC |
General
| Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | No | Yes |
| Sim Size | Nano SIM | |
| Device Type | Feature Phone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | October, 2010 |
Design
| Dimensions | 46.5 x 75 x 11 mm | 81.1 x 169.5 x 10.1 mm |
| Weight | 62 g | 235 g |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
| Type | Color LCD Screen | Color IPS LCD Screen (16M Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | |
| Size | 2.2 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 6.56 inches, 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 20:9 |
| PPI | ~ 182 PPI | ~ 401 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 75.6% | |
| Glass Type | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | |
| Notch | Yes |
Memory
| RAM | 4 GB | |
| Storage | 2 GB | 64 GB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | No | Yes |
| 4G | Yes | |
| 5G | Yes | |
| VoLTE | Yes | |
| Wifi | No | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes, v5.2, A2DP, LE |
| USB | Yes | Yes, USB-C v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB on-the-go |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side | |
| Face Unlock | Yes | |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass | |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Water Resistance | Yes, 1.5 m upto 35 min | |
| IP Rating | IP68 | |
| Dust Resistant | Yes |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 5 MP | 25 MP f/1.7 (Wide Angle) 8 MP f/2.2 (Ultra Wide) with autofocus |
| Features | HDR, Panorama | |
| Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | |
| Flash | Yes, Dual LED | |
| Front Camera | No | 13 MP f/2 (Wide Angle) |
| Front Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD |
Technical
| OS | Android v12 | |
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1280 | |
| CPU | 2.4 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
| Core Details | 2x Cortex-A78@2.4 GHz& 6x Cortex-A55@2GHz | |
| GPU | 0 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| Java | Yes | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports WAP | Yes |
Multimedia
| Supports | MMS, YouTube Player | |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, AMR, MIDI, WAV | Yes |
| Video | MP4 | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes, with FM Recording | Yes |
| Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Size | 500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 4500 mAh, Li-Po Battery |
| Fast Charging | Yes, 25W Fast Charging | |
| StandBy Time | 8 days | |
| Talk Time | 3 hours |
Discuss
Related News
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Tops DXOMark’s Display Test, Beats Pixel 8 Pro And iPhone 15 Pro MaxLast month, Samsung released its Galaxy S24 series globally. The series includes three smartphones: Galaxy S24, Galaxy S24 Plus, and Galaxy S24 Ultra. And even though early adopters are facing some issues wit…
Samsung Galaxy Book 4 Pro Pre-Reservations Go Live In IndiaAfter releasing the Galaxy Book 4 lineup in its native market, Samsung will launch the portable notebooks in India soon. The company has opened the pre-reservation window for the devices, including Galaxy Boo…
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 5G to bring first-of-a-kind titanium frameSamsung has come a long way since the original Samsung Galaxy Fold launched. Cut to now, it is primed to launch the Galaxy Z Fold6 alongside the Galaxy Z Flip6. Latest reports barging in suggest Samsung could…
Vivo X100s To Come With Dimensity 9300+ SoC, Performs Better Than Vivo X100 Pro On BenchmarksExpanding the X100 series, the Chinese smartphone manufacturer Vivo will launch two new smartphones: X100s and X100 Ultra. Out of the two, the former has appeared on popular benchmarking platforms, revealing …
Related Mobile Phones
Related Searches
Related Comparisons
Micromax X60 Modu T vs Samsung Galaxy F54
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Xcover 7
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro Max 5G
Micromax X60 Modu T vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 vs Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Micromax X60 Modu T vs Nokia G42 5G