Samsung Metro Slider E2550 vs Samsung C6112
Here you can compare Samsung Metro Slider E2550 and Samsung C6112. Comparing Samsung Metro Slider E2550 vs Samsung C6112 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Samsung Metro Slider E2550 stands against Samsung C6112 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Samsung Metro Slider E2550 is ₹2,939 and for Samsung C6112 is ₹7,600. The details of both of these products were last updated on Sep 25, 2022.
| Specification | Samsung Metro Slider E2550 | Samsung C6112 |
|---|---|---|
| RAM | ||
| Display | 2 inches, 120 x 160 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
| Battery | 800 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 960 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| CPU | ||
| OS | ||
| Price | ₹2,939 | ₹7,600 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 13 / 100 | 16 / 100 Better Specs |
| Display Size | 2 in | 2.4 in Bigger Display |
| Display Resolution | 120 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels Better Resolution |
| Storage | 13 MB | 30 MB More Storage |
| Rear Camera | 1.3 MP | 2 MP Better Camera Resolution |
| Weight | 87 g Lighter | 112 g |
| Thickness | 14.3 mm Slimmer | 16.5 mm |
| Battery | 800 mAh | 960 mAh Bigger Battery |
General
| Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | No | Yes |
| Device Type | Feature Phone | |
| Release Date | February, 2010 | January, 2010 |
Design
| Dimensions | 98.5 x 48.5 x 14.3 mm | 105.8 x 50 x 16.5 mm |
| Weight | 87 g | 112 g |
| Design Type | Slider | Slider |
Display
| Type | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) |
| Touch | No | No |
| Size | 2 inches, 120 x 160 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| PPI | ~100 PPI | ~167 PPI |
Memory
| Phonebook | 1000 entries | 1000 entries |
| Storage | 13 MB | 30 MB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 8 GB | Yes, upto 8 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | No | No |
| Wifi | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 | Yes, v2.1 |
| USB | Yes v2.0 | Yes v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB Storage |
Extra
| GPS | No | No |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | No | No |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 1.3 MP | 2 MP |
| Video Recording | 176 x 144 px @ 15fps | 176 x 144 px @ 15fps |
| Front Camera | No | No |
Technical
| Java | Yes, MIDP v2 | Yes, MIDP v2 |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
| Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Calendar | MMS, Voice Recording, Calendar |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA, WAV, AMR, MIDI | MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA, AMR |
| Video | MPEG4 | MPEG4, H.263 |
| FM Radio | Yes, with FM Recording | Yes, with FM Recording |
Battery
| Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 800 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 960 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| StandBy Time | 23 days | 16 days |
| Talk Time | 570 min | 9 hours |
Discuss
Related News
GoPro Hero11 Black series launched in India with Mini and Creator Edition; Checkout detailsGoPro has introduced the new Hero11 Black series cameras in India in three different variants – Hero11 Black, Hero11 Black Mini and Hero11 Black Creator Edition. The new Hero11 lineups arrive with a larger 27…
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Review (long term): Loaded with specs, High on performanceSamsung Galaxy S22+ review Summary: Editor’s rating: 4/5 Design Display Performance Battery Camera Pros Stunning screen Good camera setup Fast processor Apt for gaming Strong build quality Cons Slow charging …
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G Review: A powerful device under 45k?Samsung Galaxy A73 5G review summary: Editor rating: 3.6/5 Design Display Performance Battery Camera Pros Premium design Good display Good performance Great battery life Cons Low light camera performance Old …
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE Review: A near-perfect allrounderSamsung Galaxy S21 FE Review summary: Editor’s rating: 3.85/5 Pros Excellent Display Appealing design Capable cameras Android 12 based software Cons Pricey Comparatively slow charging speeds No charging adapt…
