Kult Ambition vs Salora POWERMaxx Z1
Here you can compare Kult Ambition and Salora POWERMaxx Z1. Comparing Kult Ambition vs Salora POWERMaxx Z1 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Kult Ambition stands against Salora POWERMaxx Z1 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Kult Ambition is ₹3,999 and for Salora POWERMaxx Z1 is ₹8,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 19, 2024.
Specification | Kult Ambition | Salora POWERMaxx Z1 |
---|---|---|
CPU | 1.25 GHz, Quad Core Processor | 1 GHz, Dual Core Processor |
Display | 5 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels | 4.5 inches, 960 x 540 pixels |
Internal Memory | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Rear Camera | 13 MP | 8 MP with autofocus |
Battery | 2600 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3200 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
Price | ₹3,999 | ₹8,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 51 / 100 Better Specs | 39 / 100 |
Display Size | 5 in Bigger Display | 4.5 in |
Display Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels Better Resolution | 960 x 540 pixels |
RAM | 3 GB More RAM | 512 MB |
Storage | 32 GB More Storage | 4 GB |
CPU Clock Speed | 1.25 GHz Faster Clock Speed | 1 GHz |
CPU Cores | Quad Core More CPU Cores | Dual Core |
Rear Camera | 13 MP Better Camera Resolution | 8 MP |
Front Camera | 5 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | 1.3 MP |
Weight | 159 g Lighter | 170 g |
Thickness | 10.9 mm Slimmer | |
Battery | 2600 mAh | 3200 mAh Bigger Battery |
Unique Features | Fingerprint Sensor 4G 3.5mm Audio Jack | No No No |
General
Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
Design
Dimensions | 64.5 x 131 x 10.9 mm | |
Weight | 159 g | 170 g |
Design Type | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
Type | Color IPS Screen (16M Colors) | Color IPS Screen (16M colors Colors) |
Touch | Yes | Yes |
Size | 5 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels | 4.5 inches, 960 x 540 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
PPI | ~ 294 PPI | ~ 245 PPI |
Memory
Phonebook | Unlimited | |
RAM | 3 GB | 512 MB |
Storage | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes, upto 32 GB |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | Yes |
EDGE | Yes | Yes |
3G | Yes | Yes 7.2 Mbps Download 5.76 Mbps Upload |
4G | Yes | |
VoLTE | Yes | |
Wifi | Yes | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
USB | Yes, microUSB | Yes |
Extra
GPS | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Rear | |
Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity sensor, Ambient light sensor, eCompass | Accelerometer |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes |
Camera
Rear Camera | 13 MP | 8 MP with autofocus |
Features | Panorama | |
Flash | Yes, LED | Yes |
Front Camera | 5 MP | 1.3 MP |
Technical
OS | Android v7.0 (Nougat) | Android v4.0.4 (ICS), upgradable to v4.1 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | T720 | |
CPU | 1.25 GHz, Quad Core Processor | 1 GHz, Dual Core Processor |
GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 | 0 |
Java | No | Yes, via 3rd party |
Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging | |
Yes | Yes | |
Music | Yes | MP3 |
Video | Yes | 3GP, MP4, AVI |
FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
Size | 2600 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3200 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
StandBy Time | 17 days | |
Talk Time | 18 hours |
Discuss
Related News
The Redmi Pad Pro has been spotted on the Google Play Console database, which indicates that a global and Indian launch is imminent. The database reveals that the Redmi Pad Pro 5G will have the 24074RPD2I mod…
The Motorola Moto G64 is arriving in India tomorrow. It will be the successor to Moto G54 5G which was launched in 2023. Moto G64 will be the first device to be powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7025 chipset in t…
Xiaomi’s Note series and Realme’s Number series have been dominating the 15K to 20K segment for years now. But their recent pivot to the sub-30K segment left room for some new smartphones to take over. This i…
WhatsApp has been compressing photos and videos for years without giving users the choice to opt-out. Fortunately, the app recently rolled out an update that fixed this issue by allowing users to individually…