Here you can compare Nokia 2700 Classic and Nokia X3-02 Touch and Type. Comparing Nokia 2700 Classic vs Nokia X3-02 Touch and Type on Smartprix, enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Nokia 2700 Classic stands against Nokia X3-02 Touch and Type and which one should you buy. The current lowest price found for Nokia 2700 Classic is ₹1,199 and for Nokia X3-02 Touch and Type is ₹3,598. The details of both of these products were last updated on Sep 22, 2021.
|Specification||Nokia 2700 Classic||Nokia X3-02 Touch and Type|
|Rear Camera||2 MP||5 MP|
|Display||2 inches, 240 x 320 pixels||2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5G (6GB RAM +128GB)
Show:All Features Differences
|Overview||Advantages (Factors To Decide Which Device You Should Buy) Remove All Devices|
|Rankings||# 2||# 1|
|Specs Score||15 / 100||24 / 100|
|Features Present In Only One Device|
Around 18% more Battery Capacity than Nokia X3-02 Touch and Type. With more battery size, device's battery can generally last more time, though it depends on various other factors too.
Has a Touch Screen
Touch Displays offer a more interactive experience.
Longer Battery Talk Time
Around 20 longer Battery Talk Time than Nokia X3-02 Touch and Type. With longer battery talk time, you can talk on your device continously without charging.
Around 20% bigger screen than Nokia 2700 Classic. Reading, browsing internet and watching movies is more pleasing experience on a bigger screen.
Nokia X3-02 Touch and Type is 3G Enabled. 3G Enabled Handsets give you more download speed and a faster internet experience.
Nokia X3-02 Touch and Type is Wifi Enabled. You can connect to wifi hotspots in your area to experience a superior internet experience.
Around 31% slimmer than Nokia 2700 Classic. Slimmer devices are easier to carry in pocket and look more fashionable.
Around 9% lighter than Nokia 2700 Classic. Light weight devices are easier to hold without tiring your arms.
Better Camera Resolution
Around 150% more mega pixels (MP) than Nokia 2700 Classic. More resolution generally means better picture quality, though it's not always necessary.
More Storage Capacity
Around 56% more inbuilt memory than Nokia 2700 Classic. More memory allows you to store more songs, videos, photos and install more applications.
Longer Battery Standby Time
Around 36 longer Battery Standby Time than Nokia 2700 Classic. With longer standby time, device's battery can last more days without charging in idle condition.
|Sim Type||Single Sim, GSM||Single Sim, GSM|
|Device Type||Feature Phone|
|Release Date||January, 2009||August, 2010|
|Dimensions||109.2 x 46 x 14 mm||106.2 x 48.4 x 9.6 mm|
|Weight||85 g||77 g|
|Design Type||Classic (Candybar)||Classic (Candybar)|
|Type||Color TFT screen (256K colors)||Color TFT screen (256K colors)|
|Size||2 inches, 240 x 320 pixels||2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels|
|PPI||~200 PPI||~167 PPI|
|Storage||32 MB||50 MB|
|Card Slot||Yes, upto 2 GB||Yes, upto 32 GB|
|3G||No||Yes 10.2 Mbps Download 2 Mbps Upload|
|Wifi||No||Yes, with wifi-hotspot|
|Bluetooth||Yes, v2.0||Yes, v2.1|
|USB||Yes, microUSB v2.0||Yes, microUSB v2.0|
|USB Features||USB on-the-go, USB Storage|
|3.5mm Headphone Jack||Yes||Yes|
|Rear Camera||2 MP||5 MP|
|Video Recording||220 x 176 px @ 15fps||480p @ 18fps|
|Java||Yes, MIDP v2.1||Yes, MIDP v2.1|
|Browser||Yes, supports HTML/Flash||Yes, supports HTML/Flash|
|Supports||MMS, Voice Recording, Voice Commands, Calendar||MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Calendar, YouTube Player|
|Music||MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA, WAV, AMR||MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA, WAV, MP4, AMR, MIDI|
|Video||MPEG4, H.263, 3GPP||MPEG4, H.263, H.264, WMV, 3GPP|
|Type||Removable Battery||Removable Battery|
|Size||1020 mAh, Li-ion Battery||860 mAh, Li-ion Battery|
|StandBy Time||12 days||17 days, 17 days on 3G|
|Talk Time||385 min||320 min, 210 min on 3G|
|Music Playback Time||12 hours||28 hours|
|Differences||Add Another Product||Add Another Product|