Here you can compare Nokia 2690 and Micromax Q3. Comparing Nokia 2690 vs Micromax Q3 on Smartprix, enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Nokia 2690 stands against Micromax Q3 and which one should you buy. The current lowest price found for Nokia 2690 is ₹1,150 and for Micromax Q3 is ₹1,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on Mar 05, 2021.
Specification | Nokia 2690 | Micromax Q3 |
---|---|---|
Rear Camera | 0.3 MP | 1.3 MP |
OS | - | - |
Internal Memory | - | 10 MB |
Display | 1.8 inches, 128 x 160 pixels | 2.2 inches, 176 x 220 pixels |
Battery | 860 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1000 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
Price | ₹1,150 | ₹1,999 |
Features | Nokia 2690 | Micromax Q3 | Realme Narzo 30 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro |
---|---|---|---|---|
Show: All Features Differences | ||||
Overview | Advantages (Factors To Decide Which Device You Should Buy) Remove All Devices | |||
Rankings | # 1 | # 2 | ||
Specs Score | 13 / 100 | 13 / 100 | ||
Features Present In Only One Device (Unique Features) | Light Weight
Around 17% lighter than Micromax Q3. Light weight devices are easier to hold without tiring your arms. | Bigger Screen
Around 22% bigger screen than Nokia 2690. Reading, browsing internet and watching movies is more pleasing experience on a bigger screen. | ||
Longer Battery Standby Time
Around 110 longer Battery Standby Time than Micromax Q3. With longer standby time, device's battery can last more days without charging in idle condition. | Better Screen Resolution
Around 89% more pixels than Nokia 2690. More resolution means sharper and crisper screen. | |||
Longer Battery Talk Time
Around 12 longer Battery Talk Time than Micromax Q3. With longer battery talk time, you can talk on your device continously without charging. | Slimmer
Around 5% slimmer than Nokia 2690. Slimmer devices are easier to carry in pocket and look more fashionable. | |||
3.5mm Headphone Jack
Having 3.5mm Jack enables you to connect to large number of other devices (such as speakers) having 3.5mm Port. | Better Camera Resolution
Around 333% more mega pixels (MP) than Nokia 2690. More resolution generally means better picture quality, though it's not always necessary. | |||
Bigger Battery
Around 16% more Battery Capacity than Nokia 2690. With more battery size, device's battery can generally last more time, though it depends on various other factors too. | ||||
General | ||||
Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | ||
Dual Sim | No | Yes | ||
Release Date | November, 2009 | June, 2009 | ||
Design | ||||
Dimensions | 107.5 x 45.5 x 13.8 mm | 111.2 x 61.2 x 13 mm | ||
Weight | 80 g | 97 g | ||
Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | |||
Display | ||||
Type | Color TFT screen (256K colors) | Color TFT screen (65K colors) | ||
Touch | No | |||
Size | 1.8 inches, 128 x 160 pixels | 2.2 inches, 176 x 220 pixels | ||
Aspect Ratio | 5:4 | 5:4 | ||
PPI | ~114 PPI | ~128 PPI | ||
Memory | ||||
Phonebook | 2000 entries | 1000 entries | ||
Storage | 10 MB | |||
Card Slot | Yes, upto 8 GB | Yes, upto 2 GB | ||
Connectivity | ||||
GPRS | Yes | Yes | ||
EDGE | Yes | No | ||
3G | No | No | ||
Wifi | No | No | ||
Bluetooth | Yes, v2.0 | Yes | ||
USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes | ||
Extra | ||||
GPS | No | No | ||
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | No | ||
Camera | ||||
Rear Camera | 0.3 MP | 1.3 MP | ||
Video Recording | 176 x 144 px @ 15fps | |||
Front Camera | No | No | ||
Technical | ||||
Java | Yes, MIDP v2.1 | Yes, MIDP v2 | ||
Browser | Yes, supports HTML/Flash | Yes, supports HTML | ||
Multimedia | ||||
Supports | MMS, Voice Recording, Calendar | MMS | ||
Yes | ||||
Music | MP3, AAC | MP3, WAV | ||
Video | MP4, H.263 | MP4, H.263 | ||
FM Radio | Yes | Yes, with FM Recording | ||
Battery | ||||
Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery | ||
Size | 860 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | ||
StandBy Time | 14 days | 160 hours | ||
Talk Time | 270 min | 4 hours |