Micromax X940 vs Nokia 216 Dual Sim
Here you can compare Micromax X940 and Nokia 216 Dual Sim. Comparing Micromax X940 vs Nokia 216 Dual Sim on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Micromax X940 stands against Nokia 216 Dual Sim and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Micromax X940 is ₹1,399 and for Nokia 216 Dual Sim is ₹1,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on May 04, 2024.
Specification | Micromax X940 | Nokia 216 Dual Sim |
---|---|---|
Internal Memory | 56 MB | |
RAM | 40 MB | 16 MB |
Battery | 3000 mAh | 1020 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
CPU | ||
Display | 2.7 inches, 320 x 480 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
Price | ₹1,399 | ₹1,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 11 / 100 | 17 / 100 Better Specs |
Display Size | 2.7 in Bigger Display | 2.4 in |
Display Resolution | 320 x 480 pixels Better Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels |
Screen To Body Ratio | ~ 30.1% Less Bezels | |
RAM | 40 MB More RAM | 16 MB |
Storage | 56 MB More Storage | |
Rear Camera | 0.03 MP | 0.3 MP Better Camera Resolution |
Front Camera | 0.3 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | |
Weight | 82 g Lighter | |
Thickness | 13.5 mm Slimmer | |
Battery | 3000 mAh Bigger Battery | 1020 mAh |
Unique Features | No No No | 3.5mm Audio Jack FM Radio Memory Card Support |
General
Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
Sim Size | Mini+Mini SIM | |
Device Type | Feature Phone | Feature Phone |
Release Date | September, 2016 |
Design
Dimensions | 50.2 x 118 x 13.5 mm | |
Weight | 82 g |
Display
Type | Color | Color TFT Screen |
Touch | No | |
Size | 2.7 inches, 320 x 480 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
PPI | ~ 214 PPI | ~ 167 PPI |
Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 30.1% |
Memory
Phonebook | 2000 entries | |
RAM | 40 MB | 16 MB |
Storage | 56 MB | |
Card Slot | No | Yes, upto 32 GB |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | Yes |
EDGE | Yes | Yes |
3G | No | No |
Wifi | No | No |
Bluetooth | Yes, v3.0 | |
USB | Yes, microUSB v1.1 |
Extra
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes |
Camera
Rear Camera | 0.03 MP | 0.3 MP |
Video Recording | No | |
Flash | Yes, LED | |
Front Camera | No | 0.3 MP with LED Flash |
Technical
Java | No | No |
Browser | Yes, supports WAP 2.0/xHTML |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS | |
Music | MP3, WAV, AAC | |
Video | MP4, H.264 | |
FM Radio | No | Yes |
Battery
Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
Size | 3000 mAh | 1020 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
StandBy Time | 19 days | |
Talk Time | 18 hours | |
Music Playback Time | 47 hours |
Discuss
Related News
Smartphones have become an integral part of our lives nowadays. This is because it isn’t just a device to call or text, In today’s times, smartphones are used for almost everything. Booking flights, trains, b…
HMD Global has rebranded Nokia’s website and social handles, indicating that the company will soon enter the smartphone market. Although this will allow the Finnish company to sell its products, the developme…
At the ongoing Mobile World Congress event in Barcelona, Motorola showcased a bending smartphone that wraps around users’ wrists. Even though it’s a concept phone that might not make it to production, it demo…
Curved-edge smartphone displays used to be exclusive to Samsung at the start (that is if you don’t count LG’s G Flex and G Flex 2), but now they are more common and we do see these swanky screens on phones fr…