Panasonic Eluga A3 vs Micromax E360
Here you can compare Panasonic Eluga A3 and Micromax E360. Comparing Panasonic Eluga A3 vs Micromax E360 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Panasonic Eluga A3 stands against Micromax E360 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Panasonic Eluga A3 is ₹4,990 and for Micromax E360 is ₹3,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 25, 2024.
Specification | Panasonic Eluga A3 | Micromax E360 |
---|---|---|
CPU | 1.25 GHz, Quad Core Processor | |
OS | Android v7.0 (Nougat) | |
Battery | 4000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1000 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
Rear Camera | 13 MP (Main) with autofocus | 3 MP |
Display | 5.2 inches, 1280 x 720 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
Price | ₹4,990 | ₹3,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 54 / 100 Better Specs | 18 / 100 |
Sim Count | Dual Sim More Sim Slots | Single Sim |
Display Size | 5.2 in Bigger Display | 2.4 in |
Display Resolution | 1280 x 720 pixels Better Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels |
Screen To Body Ratio | ~ 69.2% Less Bezels | |
RAM | 3 GB More RAM | |
Storage | 16 GB More Storage | 2 GB |
CPU Clock Speed | 1.25 GHz Faster Clock Speed | |
CPU Cores | Quad Core More CPU Cores | |
Rear Camera | 13 MP Better Camera Resolution | 3 MP |
Front Camera | 8 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | |
Weight | 161 g | 110 g Lighter |
Thickness | 9.1 mm Slimmer | 13 mm |
Battery | 4000 mAh Bigger Battery | 1000 mAh |
Unique Features | Fingerprint Sensor 4G | No No |
General
Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Single Sim, CDMA |
Dual Sim | Yes | No |
Device Type | Smartphone | Feature Phone |
Release Date | August, 2017 |
Design
Dimensions | 72.4 x 148.7 x 9.1 mm | 50 x 113 x 13 mm |
Weight | 161 g | 110 g |
Design Type | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
Type | Color IPS LCD Screen (16M Colors) | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) |
Touch | Yes | No |
Size | 5.2 inches, 1280 x 720 pixels | 2.4 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 4:3 |
PPI | ~ 282 PPI | ~ 167 PPI |
Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 69.2% |
Memory
Phonebook | 1000 entries | |
RAM | 3 GB | |
Storage | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Card Slot | Yes, upto 128 GB | Yes, upto 8 GB |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | Yes |
EDGE | Yes | Yes |
3G | Yes | No |
4G | Yes | |
VoLTE | Yes | |
Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0, A2DP | Yes, v2.1 |
USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes |
Extra
GPS | Yes | No |
Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Front | |
Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity | |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
Rear Camera | 13 MP (Main) with autofocus | 3 MP |
Video Recording | 1080p @ 30 fps FHD | |
Flash | Yes, LED | No |
Front Camera | 8 MP | No |
Technical
OS | Android v7.0 (Nougat) | |
Chipset | MediaTek Helio MT6737 | |
CPU | 1.25 GHz, Quad Core Processor | |
GPU | Mali-T720 | |
Java | No | Yes |
Browser | Yes, supports HTML5 | Yes, supports WAP |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS | |
Yes | Yes | |
Music | Yes | MP3, AAC |
Video | Yes | MP4, 3GP |
FM Radio | Yes | Yes, with FM Recording |
Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
Size | 4000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1000 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
StandBy Time | 8 days | |
Talk Time | 4 hours |
Discuss
Related News
The service experience at Google Pixel service centers in India can be mixed, as illustrated by a recent experience shared by a user-facing slow charging issues with his Google Pixel 7 Pro. This article delve…
The Chinese smartphone brand Vivo recently launched the T3x 5G in India, a mid-range smartphone that competes with the Moto G64 5G and the Redmi Note 13 5G. Given that prospective customers could be confused …
JioCinema, the streaming service owned by Reliance Jio, has introduced its first-ever paid subscription plans. This move comes after the streaming service added Hollywood content to its library, including con…
Nothing is a new tech company that has quickly gained popularity, thanks to its unique design, marketing, and, most importantly, its focus on improving the user experience. But what about the privacy of users…