Onida i405 vs Micromax Canvas Unite A092
Here you can compare Onida i405 and Micromax Canvas Unite A092. Comparing Onida i405 vs Micromax Canvas Unite A092 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Onida i405 stands against Micromax Canvas Unite A092 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Onida i405 is ₹2,400 and for Micromax Canvas Unite A092 is ₹2,795. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 19, 2024.
| Specification | Onida i405 | Micromax Canvas Unite A092 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Camera | 5 MP with autofocus | 5 MP |
| RAM | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Battery | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Internal Memory | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display | 4 inches, 320 x 480 pixels | 4 inches, 800 x 480 pixels |
| Price | ₹2,400 | ₹2,795 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 33 / 100 | 41 / 100 Better Specs |
| Display Resolution | 320 x 480 pixels | 800 x 480 pixels Better Resolution |
| RAM | 512 MB | 1 GB More RAM |
| Storage | 4 GB | 8 GB More Storage |
| CPU Clock Speed | 1 GHz | 1.2 GHz Faster Clock Speed |
| CPU Cores | Dual Core | Quad Core More CPU Cores |
| Weight | 120 g Lighter | |
| Thickness | 10.5 mm Slimmer |
General
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | June, 2014 |
Design
| Dimensions | 65.4 x 127.5 x 10.5 mm | |
| Weight | 120 g | |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
| Type | Color LCD Screen | Color IPS Screen (16M colors Colors) |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 4 inches, 320 x 480 pixels | 4 inches, 800 x 480 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 3:2 | 5:3 |
| PPI | ~ 144 PPI | ~ 233 PPI |
Memory
| RAM | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Storage | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes, upto 32 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes 21 Mbps Download 5.76 Mbps Upload |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes, v4.0 |
| USB | Yes, microUSB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB Tethering |
Extra
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 5 MP with autofocus | 5 MP |
| Features | Night Mode | |
| Video Recording | 720p | |
| Flash | Yes, LED | |
| Front Camera | 0.3 MP | 0.3 MP |
Technical
| OS | Android v4.4.2 (KitKat) | Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean) |
| Chipset | MSM8212 | |
| CPU | 1 GHz, Dual Core Processor | 1.2 GHz, Quad Core Processor |
| Java | Yes, via 3rd party | Yes, via 3rd party |
Multimedia
| Supports | Calendar | |
| Music | AAC, MIDI, WAV, AMR, MP3 | |
| Video | H.264, 3GP, H.263 | |
| FM Radio | Yes, with FM Recording | Yes, with FM Recording |
| Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| StandBy Time | 170 hours | 140 hours |
| Talk Time | 6 hours | 5 hours |
Discuss
Related News
Samsung Galaxy M35 Spotted on Support Page; Launch ImminentSamsung is gearing up the launch of its next M series mid-range device, the Galaxy M35 5G. The device has been spotted several times earlier on FCC and Geekbench. Now, the device has also been spotted on the …
Redmi Pad SE With Snapdragon 680 SoC And Quad-Speaker Setup To Release In India Next WeekThe Chinese consumer tech brand Redmi is gearing up to release a new tablet in the Indian market – the Redmi Pad SE. While this model made its global debut in September 2023, its Indian launch remained a myst…
Realme P1 Review: The Best Bang for Your Buck?Xiaomi’s Note series and Realme’s Number series have been dominating the 15K to 20K segment for years now. But their recent pivot to the sub-30K segment left room for some new smartphones to take over. This i…
How to Set All Photos to Videos to HD in WhatsAppWhatsApp has been compressing photos and videos for years without giving users the choice to opt-out. Fortunately, the app recently rolled out an update that fixed this issue by allowing users to individually…
