Samsung Galaxy Y S5360 vs LG GU285
Here you can compare Samsung Galaxy Y S5360 and LG GU285. Comparing Samsung Galaxy Y S5360 vs LG GU285 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Samsung Galaxy Y S5360 stands against LG GU285 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Samsung Galaxy Y S5360 is ₹2,799 and for LG GU285 is ₹4,525. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 23, 2024.
Specification | Samsung Galaxy Y S5360 | LG GU285 |
---|---|---|
Display | 3 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 2 inches, 176 x 220 pixels |
RAM | 290 MB | |
Internal Memory | 180 MB | 20 MB |
CPU | 832 MHz, Single Core Processor | |
OS | Android v2.3 (Gingerbread) | |
Price | ₹2,799 | ₹4,525 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 25 / 100 Better Specs | 16 / 100 |
Display Size | 3 in Bigger Display | 2 in |
Display Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels Better Resolution | 176 x 220 pixels |
RAM | 290 MB More RAM | |
Storage | 180 MB More Storage | 20 MB |
CPU Clock Speed | 832 MHz Faster Clock Speed | |
CPU Cores | Single Core More CPU Cores | |
Rear Camera | 2 MP Better Camera Resolution | 1.3 MP |
Front Camera | 0.07 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | |
Weight | 97 g Lighter | 105 g |
Thickness | 11.5 mm Slimmer | 14.9 mm |
Battery | 1200 mAh Bigger Battery | 900 mAh |
Unique Features | 3.5mm Audio Jack | No |
General
Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
Dual Sim | No | No |
Device Type | Smartphone | |
Release Date | August, 2011 | October, 2009 |
Design
Dimensions | 58 x 104 x 11.5 mm | 45.7 x 96 x 14.9 mm |
Weight | 97 g | 105 g |
Design Type | Slider |
Display
Type | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) |
Touch | Yes | No |
Size | 3 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 2 inches, 176 x 220 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 5:4 |
PPI | ~ 133 PPI | ~ 141 PPI |
Memory
Phonebook | Unlimited | 500 entries |
RAM | 290 MB | |
Storage | 180 MB | 20 MB |
Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes, upto 8 GB |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | Yes |
EDGE | Yes | Yes |
3G | Yes 7.2 Mbps Download | Yes |
Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No |
Bluetooth | Yes, v3.0 | Yes, v2.1 |
USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
USB Features | USB Charging, USB Storage |
Extra
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | |
Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass | |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | No |
Camera
Rear Camera | 2 MP | 1.3 MP |
Features | Smile detection, Panorama | |
Video Recording | 320 x 240 px @ 15 fps | 176 x 144 px @ 15 fps |
Front Camera | No | 0.07 MP |
Technical
OS | Android v2.3 (Gingerbread) | |
CPU | 832 MHz, Single Core Processor | |
Java | Yes, MIDP v2.1 | Yes, MIDP v2 |
Browser | Yes, supports HTML | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Calendar, YouTube Player | MMS, Voice Recording, Calendar |
Yes, with Push Email | Yes | |
Music | MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WAV, AMR, OGG | MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA |
Video | MPEG4, H.263, H.264, 3GPP | MPEG4, H.263, H.264, WMV |
FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
Size | 1200 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 900 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
StandBy Time | 35 days | 15 days |
Talk Time | 380 min | 510 min |
Discuss
Related News
Samsung launched the next in its XCover Series in India in February 2024. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 was rolled out with options to choose between two editions- Standard and Enterprise. The phone is specific…
Samsung has come a long way since the original Samsung Galaxy Fold launched. Cut to now, it is primed to launch the Galaxy Z Fold6 alongside the Galaxy Z Flip6. Latest reports barging in suggest Samsung could…
Samsung India has unveiled the pricing of the Galaxy A55 5G and the Galaxy A35 5G today. Both phones come in two RAM and storage configurations. While the Galaxy A55 5G offers 256GB of storage across all vari…
Nothing is a new tech company that has quickly gained popularity, thanks to its unique design, marketing, and, most importantly, its focus on improving the user experience. But what about the privacy of users…