Here you can compare LG Cookie WiFi T310i and Micromax X261. Comparing LG Cookie WiFi T310i vs Micromax X261 on Smartprix, enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how LG Cookie WiFi T310i stands against Micromax X261 and which one should you buy. The current lowest price found for LG Cookie WiFi T310i is ₹2,199 and for Micromax X261 is ₹2,550. The details of both of these products were last updated on Dec 12, 2019.
Specification | LG Cookie WiFi T310i | Micromax X261 |
---|---|---|
Rear Camera | 2 MP | 1.3 MP |
Display | 2.8 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels |
OS | - | - |
Battery | 900 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1000 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
Internal Memory | 20 MB | - |
Price | ₹2,199 | ₹2,550 |
Features | LG Cookie WiFi T310i | Micromax X261 | Intex Aqua S3 | OPPO R11 Plus |
---|---|---|---|---|
Show: All Features Differences | ||||
Overview | Advantages (Factors To Decide Which Device You Should Buy) Remove All Devices | |||
Rankings | # 1 | # 2 | ||
Specs Score | 20 / 100 | 11 / 100 | ||
Features Present In Only One Device (Unique Features) | Has a Touch Screen
Touch Displays offer a more interactive experience. | Bigger Battery
Around 11% more Battery Capacity than LG Cookie WiFi T310i. With more battery size, device's battery can generally last more time, though it depends on various other factors too. | ||
Better Screen Resolution
Around 98% more pixels than Micromax X261. More resolution means sharper and crisper screen. | Longer Battery Talk Time
Around 28 longer Battery Talk Time than LG Cookie WiFi T310i. With longer battery talk time, you can talk on your device continously without charging. | |||
Supports Wifi
LG Cookie WiFi T310i is Wifi Enabled. You can connect to wifi hotspots in your area to experience a superior internet experience. | ||||
Slimmer
Around 22% slimmer than Micromax X261. Slimmer devices are easier to carry in pocket and look more fashionable. | ||||
Better Camera Resolution
Around 53% more mega pixels (MP) than Micromax X261. More resolution generally means better picture quality, though it's not always necessary. | ||||
Longer Battery Standby Time
Around 76 longer Battery Standby Time than Micromax X261. With longer standby time, device's battery can last more days without charging in idle condition. | ||||
3.5mm Headphone Jack
Having 3.5mm Jack enables you to connect to large number of other devices (such as speakers) having 3.5mm Port. | ||||
General | ||||
Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | ||
Dual Sim | No | Yes | ||
Device Type | Feature Phone | |||
Release Date | December, 2010 | |||
Design | ||||
Dimensions | 102.9 x 56.9 x 11.9 mm | 112 x 48 x 15.45 mm | ||
Weight | 86 g | |||
Display | ||||
Type | Color TFT screen (65K colors) | |||
Touch | Yes, Resistive | |||
Size | 2.8 inches, 240 x 320 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels | ||
Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 5:4 | ||
PPI | ~143 PPI | |||
Memory | ||||
Phonebook | 1000 entries | 500 entries | ||
Storage | 20 MB | |||
Card Slot | Yes, upto 4 GB | Yes, upto 8 GB | ||
Connectivity | ||||
GPRS | Yes | |||
EDGE | Yes | |||
3G | No | No | ||
Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No | ||
Bluetooth | Yes, v2.0 | Yes | ||
USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | |||
Extra | ||||
GPS | No | No | ||
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | |||
Camera | ||||
Rear Camera | 2 MP | 1.3 MP | ||
Video Recording | 320 x 240 px @ 15fps | |||
Front Camera | No | No | ||
Technical | ||||
Java | Yes, MIDP v2.1 | No | ||
Browser | Yes, supports HTML | |||
Multimedia | ||||
Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging | MMS, Calendar | ||
Yes | ||||
Music | MP3, eAAC+, WAV | MP3 | ||
Video | MP4, H.264 | MPEG4 | ||
FM Radio | Yes | Yes, with FM Recording | ||
Battery | ||||
Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery | ||
Size | 900 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1000 mAh, Li-ion Battery | ||
StandBy Time | 12 days | 7 days | ||
Talk Time | 210 min | 270 min |