Intex Turbo 220 vs Intex Eco 215
Here you can compare Intex Turbo 220 and Intex Eco 215. Comparing Intex Turbo 220 vs Intex Eco 215 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Intex Turbo 220 stands against Intex Eco 215 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Intex Turbo 220 is ₹1,029 and for Intex Eco 215 is ₹849. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 23, 2024.
| Specification | Intex Turbo 220 | Intex Eco 215 |
|---|---|---|
| Internal Memory | 10 MB | 50 MB |
| Display | 2.4 inches, 100 x 100 pixels | 1.77 inches, 128 x 160 pixels |
| RAM | 10 MB | 10 MB |
| CPU | 100 MHz Processor | 100 MHz Processor |
| Rear Camera | 0.5 MP | 0.5 MP |
| Price | ₹1,029 | ₹849 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 10 / 100 | 13 / 100 Better Specs |
| Display Size | 2.4 in Bigger Display | 1.77 in |
| Display Resolution | 100 x 100 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels Better Resolution |
| Screen To Body Ratio | ~ 17.59% Less Bezels | |
| Storage | 10 MB | 50 MB More Storage |
| Weight | 85.7 g Lighter | |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm Slimmer | |
| Battery | 2200 mAh Bigger Battery | 1750 mAh |
| Unique Features | No No | FM Radio Memory Card Support |
General
| Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
| Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
| Sim Size | Normal SIM | Normal SIM |
| Device Type | Feature Phone | Feature Phone |
Design
| Dimensions | 48.5 x 115.6 x 14.5 mm | |
| Weight | 85.7 g |
Display
| Type | Color TFT Screen | Color TFT Screen |
| Touch | No | No |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 100 x 100 pixels | 1.77 inches, 128 x 160 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1 | 1:1 |
| PPI | ~ 59 PPI | ~ 116 PPI |
| Screen to Body Ratio | ~ 17.59% | |
| Features | ches, 262k |
Memory
| RAM | 10 MB | 10 MB |
| Storage | 10 MB | 50 MB |
| Card Slot | No | Yes, upto 32 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | |
| EDGE | Yes | |
| 3G | Yes | No |
| Wifi | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes |
Extra
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 0.5 MP | 0.5 MP |
| Features | Digital Zoom | |
| Video Recording | No | No |
| Front Camera | No | No |
Technical
| CPU | 100 MHz Processor | 100 MHz Processor |
| Java | No | No |
| Browser | Yes, supports WAP |
Multimedia
| Music | MP3 | |
| Video | 3GP, AVI, MP4 | |
| FM Radio | No | Yes, with FM Recording |
Battery
| Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 2200 mAh | 1750 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
Discuss
Related News
POCO F6 tipped to feature Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Could be a rebranded Redmi Note 13 TurboRecent reports indicate that POCO will be launching its next phone in its F-series flagship series soon. Aptly dubbed as POCO F6, the leaks suggest it would offer high-speed performance powered by a Snapdrago…
Motorola’s Concept Phone Raises More Questions Than Answers: MWC 2024At the ongoing Mobile World Congress event in Barcelona, Motorola showcased a bending smartphone that wraps around users’ wrists. Even though it’s a concept phone that might not make it to production, it demo…
Micron introduces world’s smallest UFS 4.0 storage to power flagship phonesThe Mobile World Congress (MWC) 2024 just got better or should I say ‘smaller but better’. Micron Technology just launched its next-gen UFS 4.0 mobile solution which is 20% smaller in size than the predecesso…
Vivo T3x 5G Vs. Moto G64 5G Vs. Redmi Note 13 5G: Which Smartphone Offers Better Value?The Chinese smartphone brand Vivo recently launched the T3x 5G in India, a mid-range smartphone that competes with the Moto G64 5G and the Redmi Note 13 5G. Given that prospective customers could be confused …
