Samsung Monte Bar C3200 vs Samsung Metro Slider E2550

Here you can compare Samsung Monte Bar C3200 and Samsung Metro Slider E2550. Comparing Samsung Monte Bar C3200 vs Samsung Metro Slider E2550 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Samsung Monte Bar C3200 stands against Samsung Metro Slider E2550 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Samsung Monte Bar C3200 is ₹4,620 and for Samsung Metro Slider E2550 is ₹2,939. The details of both of these products were last updated on May 21, 2026.

Specification	Samsung Monte Bar C3200	Samsung Metro Slider E2550
CPU
Battery	1000 mAh, Li-ion Battery	800 mAh, Li-ion Battery
RAM
Internal Memory	40 MB	13 MB
OS
Price	₹4,620	₹2,939

Samsung Monte Bar C3200₹4,620

# 1

Samsung Metro Slider E2550₹2,939

# 2

Add Product

Samsung Monte Bar C3200₹4,620

# 1

Samsung Metro Slider E2550₹2,939

# 2

Add Product

Add Another Product

Like
Comment
Share

Overview

Specs Score	10 / 100 Better Specs	8 / 100
Display Resolution	240 x 320 pixels Better Resolution	120 x 160 pixels
Storage	40 MB More Storage	13 MB
Rear Camera	2 MP Better Camera Resolution	1.3 MP
Weight	77 g Lighter	87 g
Thickness	13.3 mm Slimmer	14.3 mm
Battery	1000 mAh Bigger Battery	800 mAh
Unique Features	3.5mm Audio Jack	No

General

Sim Type	Single Sim, GSM	Single Sim, GSM
Dual Sim	No	No
Device Type		Feature Phone
Release Date	February, 2010	February, 2010

Design

Dimensions	46.9 x 111.8 x 13.3 mm	48.5 x 98.5 x 14.3 mm
Weight	77 g	87 g
Design Type		Slider

Display

Type	Color TFT Screen (65K colors Colors)	Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors)
Touch		No
Size	2 inches, 240 x 320 pixels	2 inches, 120 x 160 pixels
Aspect Ratio	4:3	4:3
PPI	~ 200 PPI	~ 100 PPI

Memory

Phonebook	1000 entries	1000 entries
Storage	40 MB	13 MB
Card Slot	Yes, upto 8 GB	Yes, upto 8 GB

Connectivity

GPRS	Yes	Yes
EDGE	Yes	Yes
3G	No	No
Wifi	No	No
Bluetooth	Yes, v2.1	Yes, v2.1
USB	Yes, microUSB v2.0	Yes v2.0

Extra

3.5mm Headphone Jack

Yes

Camera

Rear Camera	2 MP	1.3 MP
Video Recording	176 x 144 px @ 15 fps	176 x 144 px @ 15 fps
Front Camera	No	No

Technical

Java	Yes, MIDP v2	Yes, MIDP v2
Browser	Yes, supports HTML	Yes, supports HTML

Multimedia

Supports	MMS	MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Calendar
Email		Yes
Music	MP3, WMA, eAAC+	MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA, WAV, AMR, MIDI
Video	MP4, H.263, H.264	MPEG4
FM Radio	Yes, with FM Recording	Yes, with FM Recording

Battery

Type	Removable Battery	Removable Battery
Size	1000 mAh, Li-ion Battery	800 mAh, Li-ion Battery
StandBy Time	20 days	23 days
Talk Time	500 min	570 min

Discuss

Be the first to leave a comment.

Related News

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Long-Term Review: It Ruined Normal Phones For Me

For a long time, I viewed folding phones as an expensive, fragile gimmick. But after spending several months with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, I have to admit I was wrong, its the first Fold that truly feels …

Samsung Confirms Pixel-Level Privacy Display, Here’s How It Works on Galaxy S26 Ultra

Samsung has officially announced a new privacy feature for upcoming Galaxy phones, introducing what it calls pixel-level privacy. This confirmation comes directly from Samsung Mobile Press, making it clear th…

Samsung Galaxy S27 May Finally Let You Tap Into Japan’s Payment System Like An iPhone Can

Have you ever arrived in Japan with an Android phone and discovered your perfectly capable NFC tap-to-pay feature is completely useless, or heard this from a friend who has? You’re not alone. According to a …

OnePlus Nord CE6 Review: Massive Battery, Better Durability, Confusing Camera Decisions

The Nord CE lineup has usually focused on balancing performance, battery life, and software while keeping prices slightly lower than the main Nord series. The Nord CE5 followed that formula fairly well with a…