Motorola Defy Mini XT320 vs Samsung Galaxy Pocket S5300
Here you can compare Motorola Defy Mini XT320 and Samsung Galaxy Pocket S5300. Comparing Motorola Defy Mini XT320 vs Samsung Galaxy Pocket S5300 on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Motorola Defy Mini XT320 stands against Samsung Galaxy Pocket S5300 and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Motorola Defy Mini XT320 is ₹9,800 and for Samsung Galaxy Pocket S5300 is ₹4,999. The details of both of these products were last updated on May 26, 2026.
| Specification | Motorola Defy Mini XT320 | Samsung Galaxy Pocket S5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 1650 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1200 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| Rear Camera | 3.15 MP | 2 MP |
| Display | 3.2 inches, 320 x 480 pixels | 2.8 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
| OS | Android v2.3.6 (Gingerbread) | Android v2.3.6 (Gingerbread) |
| RAM | 512 MB | |
| Price | ₹9,800 | ₹4,999 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
| Specs Score | 18 / 100 Better Specs | 15 / 100 |
| Display Size | 3.2 in Bigger Display | 2.8 in |
| Display Resolution | 320 x 480 pixels Better Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels |
| RAM | 512 MB More RAM | |
| Storage | 3 GB More Storage | |
| CPU Clock Speed | 600 MHz | 832 MHz Faster Clock Speed |
| Rear Camera | 3.15 MP Better Camera Resolution | 2 MP |
| Front Camera | 0.3 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | |
| Weight | 107 g | 97 g Lighter |
| Battery | 1650 mAh Bigger Battery | 1200 mAh |
General
| Sim Type | Single Sim, GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
| Dual Sim | No | No |
| Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| Release Date | January, 2012 | March, 2012 |
Design
| Dimensions | 58.5 x 109 x 12.6 mm | 57.5 x 103.7 x 12 mm |
| Weight | 107 g | 97 g |
| Design Type | Classic (Candybar) | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
| Type | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) | LCD Screen |
| Touch | Yes | Yes |
| Size | 3.2 inches, 320 x 480 pixels | 2.8 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
| Aspect Ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| PPI | ~ 180 PPI | ~ 143 PPI |
Memory
| Phonebook | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| RAM | 512 MB | |
| Storage | 3 GB | |
| Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | Yes, upto 32 GB |
Connectivity
| GPRS | Yes | Yes |
| EDGE | Yes | Yes |
| 3G | Yes | Yes 3.6 Mbps Download |
| Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes, with wifi-hotspot |
| Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 | Yes, v3.0 |
| USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
| USB Features | USB Charging, USB Storage | USB Charging, USB Storage |
Extra
| GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | Yes, with A-GPS Support |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass | Accelerometer, Compass |
| 3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Extra | DLNA |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 3.15 MP | 2 MP |
| Features | Geo tagging | Smile detection, Geo tagging, Panorama |
| Video Recording | 480p | 320 x 240 px @ 15 fps |
| Flash | Yes, LED | |
| Front Camera | 0.3 MP | No |
Technical
| OS | Android v2.3.6 (Gingerbread) | Android v2.3.6 (Gingerbread) |
| CPU | 600 MHz, Single Core Processor | 832 MHz, Single Core Processor |
| Java | Yes, via 3rd party | Yes, via 3rd party |
| Browser | Yes, supports HTML/Flash | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
| Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Voice Commands, Calendar, YouTube Player | MMS, Instant Messaging, Voice Recording, Voice Commands, Calendar, YouTube Player |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Music | MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WMA, AMR, MIDI | MP3, AAC, AAC+, eAAC+, WAV, AMR, MIDI |
| Video | MPEG4, H.263, H.264 | MPEG4, H.263, H.264 |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Document Reader | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Type | Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Size | 1650 mAh, Li-ion Battery | 1200 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
| StandBy Time | 21 days | |
| Talk Time | 10 hours |
Discuss
Related News
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Review: The Smartest Android, But at What Cost?Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra is no longer trying to be the most overpowered piece of physical hardware in your pocket. It wants to be the smartest. For years, the “Ultra” moniker meant you were buying the absol…
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Long-Term Review: It Ruined Normal Phones For MeFor a long time, I viewed folding phones as an expensive, fragile gimmick. But after spending several months with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, I have to admit I was wrong, its the first Fold that truly feels …
From iPhones To Galaxy Phones: The Silent Auto-Restart Security Trick Is Going MainstreamPicture this: you’re patting your pockets for the fifth time in two minutes, retracing your steps from the kitchen to the car to the couch, and quietly blaming the dog. Samsung can’t reunite you with your pho…
vivo T5 Pro Review: Bigger Battery, Brighter Display, But The Cameras Let It DownThe vivo T-series has historically focused on balancing performance, cameras, and battery life at a relatively competitive price between the ₹25,000 to ₹35,000 range. Last year’s T4 Pro followed that formula …
