Lenovo A7000 vs Lenovo Vibe Z K910L (LTE)
Here you can compare Lenovo A7000 and Lenovo Vibe Z K910L (LTE). Comparing Lenovo A7000 vs Lenovo Vibe Z K910L (LTE) on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Lenovo A7000 stands against Lenovo Vibe Z K910L (LTE) and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Lenovo A7000 is ₹8,091 and for Lenovo Vibe Z K910L (LTE) is ₹7,990. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 23, 2024.
Specification | Lenovo A7000 | Lenovo Vibe Z K910L (LTE) |
---|---|---|
CPU | 1.5 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.2 GHz, Quad Core Processor |
Internal Memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Battery | 2900 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3000 mAh |
RAM | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Rear Camera | 8 MP with autofocus | 13 MP with autofocus |
Price | ₹8,091 | ₹7,990 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 49 / 100 | 53 / 100 Better Specs |
Sim Count | Dual Sim More Sim Slots | Single Sim |
Display Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels Better Resolution |
Storage | 8 GB | 16 GB More Storage |
CPU Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz Faster Clock Speed |
CPU Cores | Octa Core More CPU Cores | Quad Core |
Rear Camera | 8 MP | 13 MP Better Camera Resolution |
Unique Features | Memory Card Support | No |
General
Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Single Sim, GSM |
Dual Sim | Yes | No |
Sim Size | Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
Device Type | Smartphone | Smartphone |
Release Date | March, 2015 |
Design
Dimensions | 76.2 x 152.6 x 8 mm | 77 x 149 x 7.9 mm |
Weight | 140 g | 147 g |
Design Type | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
Type | Color IPS Screen (16M colors Colors) | |
Touch | Yes | Yes |
Size | 5.5 inches, 720 x 1280 pixels | 5.5 inches, 1920 x 1080 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
PPI | ~ 267 PPI | ~ 401 PPI |
Features | IPS (20 / 20 Vision Display), Multi-touch, Resistance to Finger Prints and Scratches, Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
Memory
RAM | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Storage | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Card Slot | Yes, upto 32 GB | No |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | |
EDGE | Yes | |
3G | Yes | Yes 150 Mbps Download 50 Mbps Upload |
4G | Yes | Yes |
Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.0 | Yes, v4.0 |
USB | Yes, microUSB v2.0 | Yes, microUSB v2.0 |
Extra
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS Support | Yes, with A-GPS Support |
Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass | Compass |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
Camera
Rear Camera | 8 MP with autofocus | 13 MP with autofocus |
Features | Face detection, Geo tagging, Touch to focus | |
Video Recording | 1080p | |
Flash | Yes, LED | Yes, LED |
Front Camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
Technical
OS | Android v5.0 (Lollipop) | Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean), upgradable to v4.4 (KitKat) |
Chipset | Mediatek Helio MT6752m | |
CPU | 1.5 GHz, Octa Core Processor | 2.2 GHz, Quad Core Processor |
GPU | Mali-T760MP2 | |
Java | No | Yes, via 3rd party |
Browser | Yes, supports HTML |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS, Instant Messaging | |
Yes, with Push Email | ||
Music | MP3, WAV, eAAC+, FLAC | MP3 |
Video | MP4, H.264 | Yes |
FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
Document Reader | Yes |
Battery
Type | Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
Size | 2900 mAh, Li-Po Battery | 3000 mAh |
StandBy Time | 11 days | 27 days |
Talk Time | 39 hours | 33 hours |
Discuss
Related News
Samsung has come a long way since the original Samsung Galaxy Fold launched. Cut to now, it is primed to launch the Galaxy Z Fold6 alongside the Galaxy Z Flip6. Latest reports barging in suggest Samsung could…
Earlier this week, in collaboration with @OnLeaks, we offered an exclusive first glimpse of the highly anticipated Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6. Since then, many of you have expressed keen interest in learning mor…
At the ongoing Mobile World Congress event in Barcelona, Motorola showcased a bending smartphone that wraps around users’ wrists. Even though it’s a concept phone that might not make it to production, it demo…
Nothing is a new tech company that has quickly gained popularity, thanks to its unique design, marketing, and, most importantly, its focus on improving the user experience. But what about the privacy of users…