Samsung Galaxy On Nxt vs Intex Avatar 3D 2.8 Touch & Type
Here you can compare Samsung Galaxy On Nxt and Intex Avatar 3D 2.8 Touch & Type. Comparing Samsung Galaxy On Nxt vs Intex Avatar 3D 2.8 Touch & Type on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Samsung Galaxy On Nxt stands against Intex Avatar 3D 2.8 Touch & Type and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Samsung Galaxy On Nxt is ₹8,999 and for Intex Avatar 3D 2.8 Touch & Type is ₹2,625. The details of both of these products were last updated on Apr 19, 2024.
Specification | Samsung Galaxy On Nxt | Intex Avatar 3D 2.8 Touch & Type |
---|---|---|
Battery | 3300 mAh | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
CPU | 1.6 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
Rear Camera | 13 MP | 1.3 MP |
Display | 5.5 inches, 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2.8 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
OS | Android v6 (Marshmallow) | |
Price | ₹8,999 | ₹2,625 |
- Like
- Comment
- Share
Overview
Specs Score | 57 / 100 Better Specs | 17 / 100 |
Display Size | 5.5 in Bigger Display | 2.8 in |
Display Resolution | 1920 x 1080 pixels Better Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels |
RAM | 3 GB More RAM | |
Storage | 32 GB More Storage | |
CPU Clock Speed | 1.6 GHz Faster Clock Speed | |
CPU Cores | Octa Core More CPU Cores | |
Rear Camera | 13 MP Better Camera Resolution | 1.3 MP |
Front Camera | 8 MP Better Front Camera Resolution | |
Weight | 167 g | 116 g Lighter |
Thickness | 8 mm Slimmer | 13.8 mm |
Battery | 3300 mAh Bigger Battery | 1500 mAh |
Unique Features | Fingerprint Sensor 4G 3.5mm Audio Jack No | No No No FM Radio |
General
Sim Type | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM | Dual Sim, GSM+GSM |
Dual Sim | Yes | Yes |
Sim Size | Nano SIM | |
Device Type | Smartphone | Feature Phone |
Release Date | July, 2012 |
Design
Dimensions | 75 x 151.69 x 8 mm | 66.59 x 121.4 x 13.8 mm |
Weight | 167 g | 116 g |
Design Type | Classic (Candybar) |
Display
Type | Color TFT Screen (16M colors Colors) | Color TFT Screen (256K colors Colors) |
Touch | Yes | Yes |
Size | 5.5 inches, 1920 x 1080 pixels | 2.8 inches, 240 x 320 pixels |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 4:3 |
PPI | ~ 401 PPI | ~ 143 PPI |
Memory
Phonebook | 500 entries | |
RAM | 3 GB | |
Storage | 32 GB | |
Card Slot | Yes | Yes, upto 32 GB |
Connectivity
GPRS | Yes | Yes |
EDGE | Yes | Yes |
3G | Yes | No |
4G | Yes | |
VoLTE | Yes | |
Wifi | Yes, with wifi-hotspot | No |
Bluetooth | Yes, v4.1 | Yes, v2.0 |
USB | Yes | Yes |
USB Features | USB on-the-go |
Extra
GPS | Yes | |
Fingerprint Sensor | Yes | |
Sensors | Accelerometer | |
3.5mm Headphone Jack | Yes | |
Extra Features | Call Recording |
Camera
Rear Camera | 13 MP | 1.3 MP |
Features | Face detection, Panorama, HDR | |
Video Recording | 720p @ 30 fps HD | |
Flash | Yes, LED | |
Front Camera | 8 MP | No |
Technical
OS | Android v6 (Marshmallow) | |
Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7870 | |
CPU | 1.6 GHz, Octa Core Processor | |
GPU | ARM Mali T830 MP1 | 0 |
Java | Yes, via 3rd party | No |
Browser | Yes, supports WAP |
Multimedia
Supports | MMS, Instant Messanging | |
No | ||
Music | Yes | |
Video | MP4, 3GP, AVI | |
FM Radio | No | Yes, with FM Recording |
Battery
Type | Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
Size | 3300 mAh | 1500 mAh, Li-ion Battery |
StandBy Time | 12 days | |
Talk Time | 6 hours |
Discuss
Related News
The Redmi Pad Pro has been spotted on the Google Play Console database, which indicates that a global and Indian launch is imminent. The database reveals that the Redmi Pad Pro 5G will have the 24074RPD2I mod…
Realme has introduced its mid-tier performance smartphone, the GT Neo 6 SE, in its home market. Just a few days ago, we shared the exciting news about the Realme GT Neo 6 SE’s Geekbench listing. The benchmark…
Do you have a Samsung phone and the screen suddenly went black? Well, don’t worry; you have come to the right place. In this guide, we’ll walk you through seven effective solutions to fix the Black Screen of …
WhatsApp has been compressing photos and videos for years without giving users the choice to opt-out. Fortunately, the app recently rolled out an update that fixed this issue by allowing users to individually…